Hi, I'm John Kiriakou, and welcome to Human Intelligence, the only show where espionage, politics, and scandal meet for martinis at noon and nobody bothers to clean up the mess. We have a little fun here. What we're telling you, though, is 100% fact. We're not making any of it up, and it has all been covered in the media. Sure, maybe we don't present it in the most sympathetic of ways, but it's all true. I guarantee it. So buckle up. We're ready to go. As I've mentioned in our previous episodes, when I was first recruited into the CIA in 1990, I was assigned to an analytic office that did long distance psychological evaluations of foreign leaders. What made those leaders tick? What should we expect from them in, say, trade negotiations? What should we expect of them in times of war and peace? Well, we can apply those same skills when we look at other similar cohorts. There isn't a ton of difference between leaders of countries, leaders of companies, or leaders of militaries, for example. And when literally every one of our 435 members of the House of Representatives and 100 members of the Senate believe that they should be president of the United States, well, their psychological pathologies are easy enough to discern, too. There are a lot of books out there, available online, available in bookstores that talk about the psychological makeup of CIA officers, politicians, and business leaders. Interestingly, there are striking similarities. Much of the analysis of the typical CIA officer, politician, or business leader says the same thing that New Mexico State University professor Peter Johansson said in his paper entitled, Who is James Bond?, which found that successful intelligence officers have what he called a specific triumvirate of personality traits, the stratospheric self-esteem of narcissism, the fearlessness, ruthlessness, impulsivity, and thrill-seeking of psychopathy, and the deceitfulness and exploitativeness of Machiavellianism, unquote. That, in my own personal view, is a little harsh. An actual psychopath or sociopath, according to Dutton, seeks reward at any cost, flouting consequence and elbowing risk aside. That's not really what our friends at the agency on Capitol Hill or on Wall Street necessarily do, but they are all ridiculous risk takers. One of the ways in which that manifests itself is adultery. We used to have a joke at the CIA that when you went into a conference room for a meeting, that you should never touch the table because you didn't know who was having sex on it the night before. The CIA has long had the highest divorce rate in all of government.