Muse

07-15-26 Part One - The Sunshine Protection Act
Red Eye Radio

07-15-26 Part One - The Sunshine Protection Act

from Red Eye Radio

July 15, 2026 | 01:16:12 | Government, News, Daily News, News Commentary

0 0
0.0 (0)
3
0 0
In part one of Red Eye Radio with Gary McNamara and Eric Harley, Americans got a break on inflation last month, with better deals at the gas station and cooler price increases across much of the economy. Consumer prices were up 3.5% in June from a year earlier, beating expectations and improving from the 4.2% inflation rate in May. Inflation was also lower than the 3.8% that analysts polled by The Wall Street Journal expected. Also the House passes "The Sunshine Protection Act". A Trump-backed bill that would make daylight saving time permanent / Med school deans come up empty in a tense hearing when asked point blank if men can have babies: 'Ridiculous' / and the Democratic Socialists of America launch their radical platform to abolish the US Senate in a bid to fundamentally transform America. For more talk on the issues that matter to you, listen on radio stations across America Monday-Friday 12am-5am CT (1am-6am ET and 10pm-3am PT), download the RED EYE RADIO SHOW app, asking your smart speaker, or listening at RedEyeRadioShow.com Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
0:00 / 0:00
1.0× 100%


Transcript

00:00:00 - 00:00:40 | Speaker 1:

Are you really buying a car online on Autotrader right now? Really? I can get super specific with dealer listings and see cars based on my budget. You can really have it delivered. Or pick it up. Mommy, look! I think your kid is walking up the slide. Really? Autotrader. Buy your car online. Really? Now, it's Red Eye Radio. Gary McNamara and Eric Hurley talk about everything from politics to social issues and news of the day. Whether you're up late or you're just starting your day, welcome to the show. From the Relief Factor Studios, this is Red Eye Radio.

00:00:42 - 00:01:09 | Speaker 2:

All across America, we are Red Eye Radio. He is Eric Hurley and I'm Gary McNamara. Good morning. Hi. Thank you for being here. How's everybody doing? Hope it was a good day for everyone. You know what made me chuckle yesterday? I don't have the, as I was telling you here, I don't have the exact timeline. But when I saw the inflation report that came out, and if you look at the inflation report, you can see how much energy prices affect everything.

00:01:09 - 00:01:10 | Speaker 3:

Yeah, right.

00:01:10 - 00:01:58 | Speaker 2:

You can see how much of an impact that it actually has on the inflation rate. Right, right. And as we know, oil prices over the last month and a half have come down drastically. And I don't know the, as I told you, I didn't know the exact timeline on it, but by the time it got to be to the afternoon, I had a bunch of things I had to do early in the morning. And when I started paying attention to what was going on, I saw the inflation report and how much, you know, oil prices and energy prices have on inflation overall. Right. And then the next story I saw was Trump has rescinded the 20 percent surcharge on oil tankers going through the Strait of Hormuz.

00:01:59 - 00:02:03 | Speaker 3:

I'm like, you know, it was horrible, too, because they had already set up the tollbooths.

00:02:07 - 00:02:53 | Speaker 2:

I saw I'm sitting there going, oh, OK, you know, there it goes. And it really is, I mean, it's not amazing. I mean, it's just when you see it, when you see when oil prices drastically come down, how that affects so much. Yeah, yeah, yeah. You know, there's still things, you know, we're not out of the woods now, especially since oil prices went back up. I was down, I think I paid $270 last week. I'm by the gas station on the way to work. Here, the one closest to me, and it was $364. so that's you know and and so you you see that happening and so will this blip that we saw because of energy prices will it affect how people feel towards inflation no i don't believe

00:02:53 - 00:05:00 | Speaker 3:

it will at all no again uh when we talk about these reports we've said this for years when the report comes by the time the report comes out the people the everyday person has already paid for things that this report reflects they know what their pocketbook looks like that's what pocketbook for those under 80 a pocketbook was something they know what their bank accounts look like they know what they're having to pay what was it yesterday that i went in and bought uh oh uh these uh swiss cheese i went and got some swiss cheese for sandwiches and man i mean the prices are like through the roof i'm not sure what what in the world's going on but massive you know increase in the price since i last bought it i was like holy cow 11 slices of cheese for like six bucks are you kidding me you know and i'm and i'm thinking to myself if they don't if there's no there's no way before november to get on top of prices the only way they can do it is i started exactly where where you were on the inflation report because when i saw the headline itself that you know the well by the way inflation drops no the inflation rate dropped uh but the headlines were inflation drops uh uh has the biggest drop in you know whatever it was in years and it's like okay that's all energy that's all gas prices we know what that is i didn't even have to look at the report in fact didn't right away i knew what it was then i go to the grocery store a couple hours later and i'm like man this is not again the inflation report isn't something go people go wait they don't wait for the inflation report to see what they paid last month they're

00:05:00 - 00:07:11 | Speaker 1:

They already know it. Well, when you see it, you had some, you know, you had negative numbers in there. Yeah. You know, for the month. But if you look at year over year, it's still when you look at things that people actually buy, even energy, it's way up from where it was last year. Yeah. You know, overall, you know, overall energy from a year ago to where we are right now. But again, that's year to year. But but as you had analysts saying, well, just as we get the relief here because of oil prices, boom, you know, it's back on again. And, you know, oil prices are are, you know, going back up. Now, I will say this because I said this yesterday. It was interesting that the president seemed to be not talking about any deal yesterday or two days ago when well, really over the weekend when everything really started again. and we were back with military action against, you know, against Iran. But he mentioned a deal today. He said, if they don't come to a deal, we're going to do this. And it's like, wow. And people may ask, you know, like for the whole 20% thing, which he backed off on. And Trump, I'm just reading here from Politico, Trump on Tuesday walked back threats to charge a 20% fee on all cargo ships that passed through the Strait of Hormuz. Yeah. In a post of True Social, he said the strait will be open to all ship traffic except for Iran, and U.S. will implement a full blockade, but only on ships coming to and from Iranian ports or carrying anything having to do with Iranian cargo. He added the previously announced 20% fee will be replaced by trade and investment deals between the Gulf states and the United States, which, again, is always the fallback with this administration. we're going to have trace of the other day we have 19.6 trillion in investment coming in from foreign countries no we don't no i think you know that's that's what they have promised to do in the future but that is currently not happening what was at all and there is no there is no treaty there is nothing that can mandate something like that what was the deal who was it that announced

00:07:11 - 00:10:11 | Speaker 2:

their $3.5 billion investment, I forget if it was an electronics company. And the reason I forget is because the number was so low, $3.5 billion. Look, they're moving $3.5 billion worth of investment to the U.S., a positive. But $3.5 billion is a drop in the bucket if you look at the way investments go and for companies. If you're talking about we're moving all of our production to the U.S., then you've got my attention. But that happened. And I'll look it up. I'll see what it was. And the president, in fact, later that day, they were doing something at the White House. And, you know, he talked about it and he made a big deal out of it. And and the problem is, is that's not over promising. that's over celebrating just saying hey look uh it's a you know 3.5 billion isn't zero it's not the it's not uh it's not game changing for that industry but certainly it's a move in the right direction and you leave it at that and and and this is i think this is the problem on the messaging from from the administration you know i i said to myself especially this evening there seems to be more excitement if you think about it there's more movement on the getting rid of changing the clocks thing oh yeah yeah there's more excitement yep on that than far more than of course the national debt but there's more excitement and movement on that than save the the save america act the the voter id you look at the things that are critical and you know i whatever they do with the clocks whatever you know because i heard um let's uh keep daylight saving time and then there's of course those that are saying no in congress no we need to keep the standard time um you know this is going to be this is this is uh what they say that's your your circadian rhythm is is built on that and that's the way it's going to you know that's the way it should be and it's going to help farmers and it's going to be better for school children and blah blah blah blah blah you know they they're arguing and they're actually trying to argue that we can legislate more daylight hours and you can't it doesn't work that way you can say you can regulate when we're not when we're you know When the sun is going to come up and when it's not going to come up, because they're saying in some parts of the country, sunrise won't be before like 9 a.m. in some parts of the year.

00:10:12 - 00:10:54 | Speaker 2:

Well, I think it was Mitch Hedberg that said, no, it wasn't Mitch Hedberg. It was another comedian. Five hours. We moved the clock ahead five hours, and he talked about people who work overnights. I think it may have been John Mulaney. anyway it was the stand-up comedian and he said let's just move it forward five hours you know and that way the sun comes up at noon um you know there are so many things that you can control and and so many others and and there's arguments on both sides those arguments will never go away i i have my doubts as to how this is the bill did pass in the house by the way and and i don't know

00:10:54 - 00:11:00 | Speaker 1:

i haven't seen any uh i haven't seen any count for the senate they're saying this is going to

00:11:00 - 00:11:17 | Speaker 2:

be much slower in the senate well i i did see that it it faces hurdles in the senate but i they didn't attach a head count to that yeah and and so we'll see because there's a number of democrats on board with it i don't know how many of them in the senate are on board with it so

00:11:17 - 00:11:24 | Speaker 1:

Remember, tried it in 74 and didn't last, repealed it the same year. Yeah.

00:11:25 - 00:11:56 | Speaker 2:

No, that's kind of what I was alluding to yesterday. You're going to have everybody, you know, on Capitol Hill screaming in the faces of lawmakers that, of course, that it's going to affect. You know, you're going to have, of course, I don't know, the teachers union. I don't know if they would get involved. You're going to have, you know, the farmers. There's a concern there how much work can be done, you know, in a day if the sunrise isn't, you know, until 9 a.m. Of course, most farmers get up long before sunrise anyway.

00:11:57 - 00:12:00 | Speaker 1:

You know what I love? The title of the bill.

00:12:01 - 00:12:02 | Speaker 2:

Yeah.

00:12:02 - 00:12:05 | Speaker 1:

The Sunshine Protection Act. Yeah, yeah. Sunshine Protection.

00:12:05 - 00:12:20 | Speaker 2:

No, that's exactly where I was going with the, we can change the amount of sunlight we get. Well, no, no. You can change the time that it rises or the time the sun sets

00:12:20 - 00:12:29 | Speaker 1:

What I loved yesterday was a number of people saying We need to do this because we need to do what Mother Nature dictated It's like, well

00:12:29 - 00:12:30 | Speaker 2:

Right, yeah

00:12:30 - 00:12:45 | Speaker 1:

All the time stuff and everything else we do is Humans made it up Yeah Humans decided this is what we're going to call a day We're going to call a day this because of this, this, this, this, and this It's like, nothing to do with nature

00:12:45 - 00:12:55 | Speaker 2:

Well, I mean, it's, you know, how the earth revolves around the sun and everything else. And even that, we have a leap minute. How many years? Every, every.

00:12:56 - 00:13:01 | Speaker 1:

Exactly. I mean, so many years. Well, we have defined a year by going around the sun once. Right. I mean, that.

00:13:01 - 00:13:09 | Speaker 2:

But we have to have a leap day to correct our math. We have to have a leap minute. There's actually a leap minute. You don't notice it, but there's a leap minute.

00:13:09 - 00:13:28 | Speaker 1:

Nature doesn't change whether we have daylight savings or standard time. Got nothing to do with it. But I love that yesterday. It was like, we're just I guess when we're still dealing with with the left, that a man can be a woman if a man says so. Yeah. Then you can just throw out whatever crap you wish to throw out.

00:13:28 - 00:14:07 | Speaker 2:

Just just just throw it out there. And that's the frustrating part of it. You know, the the debates they're going to have aren't going to change. And so the lobbyists, if this signs and goes into effect, as I said this yesterday, if they were to sign this and the president were to sign it, if it passed in the Senate, if it went to his desk and he signed it, it went into effect, immediately lobbyists would be on Capitol Hill. And the moment you start having that, because, you know, then all of a sudden there's a new news story. And look what Trump did.

00:14:07 - 00:14:14 | Speaker 1:

he canceled daylight he's trying to cancel daylight let's see what the farmers in the

00:14:14 - 00:14:37 | Speaker 2:

midwest hey anybody got any overalls we need to wear overalls we're going to omaha hey we're uh we're we're trying to he's canceling the sun what do you think about that farmers i mean it's a real concern by farmers my point is how it will be covered by the liberal activist media You know, I mean, we're just going to have to build some tractors, I guess, with more headlights on them.

00:14:37 - 00:14:39 | Speaker 1:

Trump has destroyed time.

00:14:39 - 00:14:48 | Speaker 2:

Yeah, exactly. He's trying to, he's such a dictator, he thinks he can control how the earth revolves around the sun.

00:14:49 - 00:14:59 | Speaker 1:

But I did have, getting back to the, we'll get back to the time thing because we've got a great audio cut coming up on that one showing the...

00:15:00 - 00:15:50 | Speaker 4:

the problem with it but i did have uh a listener asked me you know what was you know they because the trump you know saying the 20 percent toll on all cargo ships most people just said he's not going to stay you know hold that and it didn't even last a day right and i had a listener say why does he do that and then back off immediately i think that the first instinct trump has on everything is economic yeah i think it's that simple yeah and that's the first instinct he has And he believes, you know, for example, when he was talking about, you know, the memorandum of understanding and that, you know, what we're going to do and the investment into Iran and, you know, how the economy will boom. And we're just like, stop it. He believes that the first instinct of people is what it is for him, which is economic.

00:15:51 - 00:15:51 | Speaker 3:

Yeah.

00:15:51 - 00:17:18 | Speaker 4:

I'm not saying it's a bad thing. I think it's a good thing in a capitalist society to have that. but those that believe in Sharia supremacy could give a damn about whether their country booms and helps the common person. They could care less, but it's his first instinct. His first instinct was whenever I do something, I've got to have an economic side to it. Sure. And that's his first instincts, and he blurts it out, and then 24 hours later, no, we're not going to do that. We're going to have massive investment deals. And it's like, okay, yeah, that's a way to, you know, that's his way out of it. But his first instinct is everything has to have an economic element to it and the belief that wherever you are around the world, you think just like he does. What I have found out is that people don't think alike. Democrats don't think like Republicans right now. They may have been closer 20 years ago, but where you've got them right now, they don't think the same way. It's not that they even differ on issues. They don't process thoughts the same way. And I think there needs to be a recognition of that. That's one of the things that we've always talked about when the Democrats would call, sit there, everything we would talk about, they'd go, you're racist, you're racist. Go, what are you talking about? There's no racism. It's because they practice identity politics. We don't. They practice identity politics. They judge people by groups and not individuals. So they project out that you must think the same way.

00:17:18 - 00:17:18 | Speaker 3:

Yeah.

00:17:19 - 00:17:20 | Speaker 4:

Yep. And people don't think the same way.

00:17:21 - 00:17:21 | Speaker 3:

No, no, they don't.

00:17:22 - 00:17:24 | Speaker 4:

We are Red Eye Radio, brought to you by Hotshot Secret.

00:17:25 - 00:18:12 | Speaker 1:

Hi, I'm Jen Loomis, a transport safety expert at JJ Keller. At a roadside inspection, inspectors may ask to see supporting documents. These documents can include bills of lading, itineraries, schedules, or equivalent documents that indicate the origin and destination of each trip. They can also include dispatch or trip records, expense receipts related to on-duty slash not-driving periods, electronic and mobile communication transmitted through a fleet management system, and payroll records, settlement sheets, or equivalent documents that indicate payment to a driver. Drivers using paper logs must also keep toll receipts. Supporting documents must contain the driver's name, carrier assigned identification number, or vehicle unit number that can be linked to the driver, the date, the name of the nearest city, town, or village, and the time. This tip was brought to you by J.J. Keller & Associates. Visit us at jjkeller.com.

00:18:13 - 00:18:19 | Speaker 2:

Lines open for your calls. 866-90-RED-EYE on Red Eye Radio.

00:18:19 - 00:18:47 | Speaker 4:

We're at Red Eye Radio. He's our Carlton, I'm Gary McNamara. Coming up, more on Daylight Saving.

00:18:47 - 00:19:46 | Speaker 3:

hey you know you know what i i did think of uh during the day yesterday if we were to go to war with iran and you know like in world war ii it required it kind of uh pushed women into the workforce right so it kind of helped to expand the economy i think we can do the same thing if in the in the event that we do need to have a large escalation a large-scale war against iran I think it's time to put children in the workforce, starting at the age of six, because hear me out, hear me out. They're being indoctrinated in schools. If they're learning real life skills on the assembly line or wherever we make things anymore, I don't know, it's been a while. then they're learning something that's going to be useful when they grow up to be adults.

00:19:46 - 00:19:51 | Speaker 4:

Plus, the Democratic socialists are being blunt as to what they want.

00:20:00 - 00:20:09 | Speaker 2:

What would you do if your online store converted 36% more shoppers? You could take 36% more vacation.

00:20:10 - 00:20:11 | Speaker 5:

Another pina colada?

00:20:11 - 00:20:15 | Speaker 2:

Yes, please. Open a new retail location with 36% more square feet.

00:20:16 - 00:20:16 | Speaker 5:

Fantastic.

00:20:16 - 00:20:33 | Speaker 2:

Hire 36% more help. You're hired and you're hired. Shopify has the world's best converting checkout, up to 36% better than other e-commerce platforms. What you do with those extra sales is up to you. Switch to Shopify today at shopify.com slash listen and get a $1 trial shopify.com slash listen.

00:20:57 - 00:21:02 | Speaker 3:

scrolling with Haley. Just search that up and I will be there. Follow and listen on your favorite

00:21:02 - 00:21:22 | Speaker 1:

platform. You're listening to Red Eye Radio from the Relief Factor Studio. And he is Eric Carley

00:21:22 - 00:22:02 | Speaker 5:

and I'm Gary McNamara. Just to show you, this is hilarious. Neil deGrasse Tyson on NewsNation about daylight saving. Watch how he says one thing and sort of contradicts himself. A couple of minutes later, here we go. I just got a kick out of this. And this is why there isn't an answer to it because it's what people personally prefer for the situation that they're in and it's different for everybody right there everybody has different needs right so here here this is here we go it's just kind of odd that we take an

00:22:02 - 00:22:56 | Speaker 6:

hour from the morning of sunlight and put it at the end of the day and somehow everybody's okay with that and we love it well before there was electric light maybe that kind of mattered a lot But who today is saying, oh, it's getting dark earlier. I don't know. I can't go out. I don't know what I'm going to do. I got to light a candle, get the whale oil. That time is long past. In the winter, where there's not much daylight to begin with, in New York City, for example, where I live, the sun won't rise until 820 in the morning. But if you're going to school on a bus, you have to walk to the bus or walk to school, and you're trying to get to school early, that will be happening in the dark. If you keep daylight saving time all year round. So there's safety issues related to that.

00:22:56 - 00:23:47 | Speaker 5:

So the first thing he comes out with is the fact that we don't need to worry about this. We have electricity. There's lights. There's no problem. And then the next statement is, but there's a lot of safety things in the morning because i i live in new york city where you would assume one of the biggest cities well the biggest city in the united states where there's lights everywhere he's saying it's still dark and that's the point lights aren't everywhere right and but he contradicts himself in just that over over daylight saving it's like wow we got electricity there's no problem the people say you know there's no lights we have lights well except for the kids going to school in new york city well that's a major city where you have more lights right yeah and one of the problems that the liberals will defeat this are like we can't turn on more lights we need to turn them off well we can't be using

00:23:47 - 00:24:35 | Speaker 4:

electricity well the blue states they're finding that out it's well we cut off the uh you know they're cutting off natural gas sources you know and they're and so uh the way that they produce electricity in some states now has changed drastically and has become brace for it more expensive so this is the this is going to be the ongoing debate this is why it's not going to be solved kids going to school in the dark is a problem which is why i think and kids are with me on this we should only have school from noon to one well again for me really doesn't matter

00:24:35 - 00:24:59 | Speaker 5:

uh summers are great i actually don't mind winters where it gets dark when i was living in new york i mean it would get dark at you know it's it would be almost dark at 4 30 quarter to 5 i i never minded that and during the winter time right because it wasn't like when you're living in winter where it's snowing and everything else, you're saying

00:25:00 - 00:25:12 | Speaker 2:

yourself i want to get out you know and and and do stuff so to me it doesn't make a difference i understand to other people why it does but this is so personal as to what your current situation is

00:25:12 - 00:26:53 | Speaker 1:

right at the moment yeah i mean it is um and and that's it's not a small thing for like you know kids going to school in the dark farmers you know having to wait uh to do certain tasks on their farms until the sun comes up that you know this is a problem um this is going to be the back and forth with policymakers and and and everybody that represents these groups starting day one if the president signs this into law if if he does sign it into law it's only a matter of time before they change it back and i and it will be it will be the different you know the the the same basically the same basis argument but it will be the opposite approach change it back everybody's been screaming end it end it end it because think about what's driving it you know there is a concern with the health effects because people are lagging man when we change the clocks i think especially in the fall for me you know it changes um but it really for the most part for if it doesn't affect you when it comes to kids going to school or if you don't own a farm or whatever if it doesn't affect you in that way it really is about just the nuisance of changing the

00:26:53 - 00:27:49 | Speaker 2:

clocks you know i i don't know well it's interesting because uh the the the reading here this is from uh nbc no this is from uh yeah this is from nbc uh the u.s remains largely split on the issue while 64 percent of americans agree the clock changes should be abolished they cannot universally agree on the solution no as many prefer permanent standard time yeah instead states have increasingly taken matters into their own hand almost all states have considered legislation to stop the changes and 19 have passed laws authorizing permanent daylight saving time if congress allows it meanwhile arizona and hawaii continue to bypass the national clock change entirely by observing permanent standard time okay the sunshine protection act

00:27:49 - 00:27:55 | Speaker 1:

we're going to control how much sunlight we get it's like

00:27:55 - 00:28:06 | Speaker 2:

so if this is coming out of congress does it mean the opposite are they not protecting sunshine I mean, the inflation reduction acted the opposite, right?

00:28:06 - 00:29:13 | Speaker 1:

Well, you know, again, the problem is, is from the Capitol Hill perspective or the White House or both, they're acting like they could actually change how much sunlight we get. Right. Well, no, it's only when we get it. you know if we're going to change the clocks i say when we someone else had this idea another comedian i say if we change the clocks when we uh spring forward we do that on a friday at 4 p.m that way boom we get off and we get off an hour early um the the problem though with you know again all of this is that the lobbyists will be in full force on this it isn't a small thing because the media will be all over it you know we're here in the dark as if they don't have

00:29:13 - 00:29:34 | Speaker 2:

you know lights when they're actually reporting no can you imagine all the local tv stations they'll be everywhere here are the mothers yeah here are the mothers furious that their kids look how dark it is well at eight o'clock and i remember that when when i went to school it when i went to school when i went to high school especially uh we had classes that started at

00:29:34 - 00:30:24 | Speaker 1:

seven yeah we were always walking to school in the dark well we had when i took uh driver education and those that's a loose term for what i learned um but when i took driver education to get my license i took it through the school and so i had to go to i actually had to to go there at i think i had to be there at 6 30 6 45 you know There were things when I was in the work program, not in prison, that was a different one. When I was in the work program at school, my job required me to actually show up at 4 a.m. on Tuesdays and Fridays and unload trucks and then go to school and then go back to my job when I got out at noon or whatever.

00:30:24 - 00:30:34 | Speaker 2:

When I was in elementary school, and we walked to school, and it was probably a half mile. Yeah. And so in kindergarten, we were walking to school.

00:30:35 - 00:30:35 | Speaker 1:

Yeah.

00:30:36 - 00:31:22 | Speaker 2:

And I went to Catholic school for the first six years, and my brother caused so much trouble that my parents said, okay, he's going to public school. You're leaving, too. Yeah. Right. You don't want to follow your brother. I always talk about that when I was in high school, I got called, you know, to the attendance office. And the guy said to me, he said, well, you weren't in study hall last week. And I said, yeah, I was. I have never skipped study hall. I'm always in there. And he said, are you John's brother? And I said, yes, I'm his younger brother. And he said, guilty as charged. I mean, that's the.

00:31:22 - 00:31:22 | Speaker 1:

Yeah.

00:31:23 - 00:31:25 | Speaker 2:

Oh, no. No, I had three older brothers.

00:31:25 - 00:31:44 | Speaker 1:

When I got to Del Rio High School, it was all over for me. Yeah, I know. But you know what they decided? Since I was the only one of my three, you know, I had three brothers, but the only one of the four Harley boys in band, I must have been a nerd, so I probably wasn't going to be in trouble a lot.

00:31:44 - 00:33:29 | Speaker 2:

So when I was in Catholic school, church, we went to church every morning, five days a week you know you went you went to church at seven o'clock yeah yeah and so we were walking to school at 6 30 it was dark during the winter time and we were kindergarten first grade and nobody made a stink about it it's just it's what it's what you did and and then class started at at eight o'clock yeah yeah and if you were going to get actually this was interesting with You'd go to church at 7 o'clock. It'd probably be over by, you know, 740. It wasn't as long as maybe some of the masses on Sunday. And the kids were all there. And then you would go. You'd bring your breakfast. There was no government breakfast being served. You brought your breakfast and you brought your lunch in a bag. And if you were going to receive communion, you're going to receive communion, you know, uh you would you would uh you would bring your you know lunch and i can remember sitting in class as classes were starting and the one woman next to me whatever happened to her all i remember is she to me we were we were in like i don't know third fourth grade and she was an adult she her penmanship was perfect and it was like i remember thinking as a kid she's like an adult in third or fourth grade i remember her breaking out her hard-boiled eggs and she had her parker pen constance scott even the name oh my gosh she's probably a ceo she probably is yeah it's like but yeah uh but but yeah so uh uh you know we went to school when it was dark all the time

00:33:29 - 00:34:20 | Speaker 1:

well you know i mean yeah we look um when we had to when we in marching band there were a lot of things during the summer actually uh they wanted us to get there super early because in del rio of course it's hot and we started summer sessions like a week or two after school ended and we went every day throughout the summer i think maybe we were off certain fridays but we would march on the field to practice our marching presentation on the field in the morning you had to and then it in the afternoon we had to go back so we would do two a days you know all summer long but it started by getting up early and it was often dark by the time you got there now when we took the field

00:34:20 - 00:34:32 | Speaker 2:

the sun had had already come up uh just just to help people understand uh eric and to give him some street cred he started out in band but he ended up as a heavy metal bass guitarist so yeah

00:34:32 - 00:34:42 | Speaker 1:

i was actually in a heavy metal band then too yeah yeah okay just wanted to make that clear right yeah yeah yeah i was a i was a guitarist drummer and bass player depending on which band you're

00:34:42 - 00:34:48 | Speaker 2:

talking he was in he was in band but he was full of testosterone heavy metal testosterone oh yeah

00:34:48 - 00:34:58 | Speaker 1:

yeah yeah no that's how i got my testosterone okay we are red eye radio we'll be right back With more Red Eye Radio with Eric Hurley and Gary McNamara.

00:35:00 - 00:36:19 | Speaker 3:

We are Red Eye Radio. He's Eric Cronin. I'm Gary McNamara. All right. What may block this saving daylight bill? Yeah. This from Politico, NBC, and the Los Angeles Times. uh the uh senator tom cotton and senate majority leader john thune have vocalized strong opposition to adopting it yeah then there's the save standard time movement advocacy groups like save standard time push lawmakers to abandon yeah daylight saving altogether arguing that locking the clock on standard time is the only biologically sound choice for public safety right and because a proposed bill allows states to opt out and choose permanent standard time instead critics worry it will create a confusing patchwork of time zones across neighboring state borders which that's why the airlines are complaining yeah right they're on saying you're going to screw up this the scheduling and everything else for people this is going to be a mess oh man it's i can't imagine every state can be whatever time they want the the time zones really won't matter anymore right

00:36:19 - 00:36:27 | Speaker 4:

In Texas, we're going to move to a seven-minute difference, an hour and seven minutes, because we're Texas.

00:36:28 - 00:36:29 | Speaker 3:

And everything's bigger.

00:36:29 - 00:37:17 | Speaker 4:

Yeah, it's just, we need more time. It's going to give us more time in the day. It's, no, it's, if you're going to do something, it needs to be one standard. You know, you keep the time zones in place. But, you know, like I said yesterday, there was talk about doing away with the eastern time zone. I'm like, yeah, you're going to have to stop. You know, you got to quit trying to, you know, manipulate everything right now. Again, this is really a populism thing that's, you know, we don't want to change the clocks ever. We don't want to change the clocks ever. But there are real concerns on both sides that will keep this on Capitol Hill for a long time. Our news is brought to you by Howe's Products. Visit Howe'sProducts.com.

00:37:18 - 00:37:22 | Speaker 1:

This is Red Eye Radio on Westwood One.

00:37:23 - 00:37:42 | Speaker 2:

Introducing Meta Glasses. You have questions, they've got answers. Hey Meta, what's the capital of Peru? Lima. How do you say, where's the restroom, in Spanish? ¿Dónde está el baño? Hey Meta, is a hot dog a sandwich? Technically, no. Spiritually, yes.

00:37:43 - 00:37:45 | Speaker 3:

Hey, Meta, what should I do with my life?

00:37:45 - 00:37:54 | Speaker 2:

That's one of life's biggest questions. What do you think? Ask anything with the new Meta Glasses. Bonjour, compadre.

00:37:54 - 00:37:56 | Speaker 3:

It's the Priceline Negotiator.

00:37:57 - 00:38:22 | Speaker 2:

How do I negotiate so many great travel deals? My greatest gadget, the Priceline app. It's got hotel deals, flight deals, rental car deals, all of those deals in a bundle. Deals, game day deals, concert trip deals. No one deals more deals than Priceline. Hold your horses. There's more. The app lets you filter hotels by neighborhood, vibe, star level, and amenities like pools and spas and beachfronts and... Wait, I'm not done. Stop cutting me off. Lights, light.

00:38:29 - 00:38:48 | Speaker 1:

Now, it's Red Eye Radio. Gary McNamara and Eric Hurley talk about everything from politics to social issues and news of the day. Whether you're up late or you're just starting your day, welcome to the show. From the Relief Factor Studios, this is Red Eye Radio.

00:38:49 - 00:40:00 | Speaker 3:

All across America, he is Eric Carley and I'm Gary McNamara. All right. I was thinking the other day we need to introduce like, and so I'm going to label this hour, maybe not the entire hour, but just label this hour, the Red Eye Radio Crazy Hour. uh wouldn't that be every hour more example that's true why limit it to an hour do we something happened that i don't know about but uh this this happened uh yesterday you had um uh you had uh dr sam hargood who is uh part of the medical department at the university of california at san francisco and uh dr uh dubinette from ucla medical school all right all right now these i'm just gonna play it we don't have to you know give too much of a preamble to it but it's on the radical transgender movement in medicine okay yeah listen to this now this is just they just won't answer the question now this is scary because if you try to get away with

00:40:00 - 00:40:10 | Speaker 5:

this in medicine whoa what won't you try here we go and this is representative uh mary miller

00:40:10 - 00:41:02 | Speaker 1:

asking the questions here we go also troubling dr benedetti it appears that dei has not left uicm on your school's about page clear as day it says and i quote at the university of illinois college of Medicine, we are committed to diversity and inclusion. We have a number of programs and initiatives in place to promote diversity and inclusion. It's clear that UICM is just hiding the fact that DEI is still its core mission. Dr. Haygood, UCSF's classroom guide titled framework for gender and sex concepts in teaching advises against using the term pregnant women. Instead, it says to use pregnant people. Who are pregnant people compared to

00:41:02 - 00:41:20 | Speaker 3:

pregnant women? Just curious. So that is a part of a curriculum to help our students who are facing a wide diversity of patients. Of course, the vast majority of pregnancies are in women and i have absolutely no problem with using the word pregnant women i use it myself

00:41:20 - 00:41:35 | Speaker 1:

has a non-biological woman ever had a baby a transgender person can that's not a biological woman has a non-biological woman ever had a baby i would by the way at that point you're fired

00:41:35 - 00:41:40 | Speaker 5:

yeah yeah it's at that point you're fired get out get out here we go more here we go reiterate

00:41:40 - 00:41:43 | Speaker 3:

We take care of transgender patients.

00:41:43 - 00:42:11 | Speaker 1:

Okay, Dr. Hagood, the UCSF guide I mentioned earlier also advises using a child's self-reported gender identity, even if it conflicts with the parent's wishes. Say a seven-year-old boy comes into your doctor's office and reveals he believes he's a girl. is UCSF advising physicians to explicitly violate parents' moral values and have the doctors address this boy as a girl.

00:42:11 - 00:42:23 | Speaker 3:

Our programs are consistent with federal and state law. We undertake comprehensive psychological and mental health evaluations and work with the parents on these issues.

00:42:23 - 00:43:02 | Speaker 1:

Okay, and I hope that you are consistent with the law because, like I say, we reserve the right. We have the right to withhold funding from any institution in violation. Lastly, Dr. Dubonnet, a required course at UCLA Medical School advises OBGYN students not to, and I quote, assume gender identity. Okay, from another class in May of 2026, it included a disclaimer that while it uses the term she and women, It does not intend to exclude, and I quote, those who have a uterus but do not identify with these terms. What does that even mean?

00:43:03 - 00:43:07 | Speaker 2:

I'm not familiar with that announcement. I'd have to read the entire thing.

00:43:07 - 00:43:17 | Speaker 1:

Okay. I hope that you go back and check it out. Can someone have a uterus but not be a woman? Because it seems like your school is promoting that ridiculous idea.

00:43:18 - 00:43:30 | Speaker 2:

I think, again, as Dr. Hoggart has described, we're treating transgender people, but we're doing that in compliance with state and federal law.

00:43:30 - 00:43:32 | Speaker 1:

And you do teach biology?

00:43:33 - 00:43:34 | Speaker 2:

Yes, we do.

00:43:34 - 00:43:44 | Speaker 1:

Yes, this is curious. So I'm going to ask you again, can someone have a uterus and not be a woman? Just say yes or no. Can they?

00:43:44 - 00:43:46 | Speaker 2:

Again, I would

00:43:46 - 00:43:49 | Speaker 1:

That's what your medical school is promoting

00:43:49 - 00:44:08 | Speaker 5:

You're fired You're fired If you wish to be A delusional Liberal congressperson or senator Or president And promote that Fine In the medical profession You're talking biology

00:44:08 - 00:44:59 | Speaker 4:

Well, and this was something that The Trump administration directly addressed with the CDC after years of the Obama administration. This was during Trump's first term. During the years of the Obama administration and the CDC, they were changing terminology. And it's important that you not do that. So what they do is they tiptoe around it. What gender were you assigned at birth? Well, what do you mean assigned? Assigned by who? What did they say you were? What did somebody just, you know, with no authority to do so? That's the implication.

00:45:00 - 00:45:11 | Speaker 1:

What gender did they assign you at birth? What's your biological gender? That's the question.

00:45:11 - 00:45:11 | Speaker 2:

Can't answer it.

00:45:12 - 00:47:24 | Speaker 1:

You cannot answer that. And this is a problem. You know, the American Medical Association, remember that case that ended? It was, I don't know, two, three months ago, maybe longer. and you had said for years, look, the lawsuits are going to change things, especially when it comes to children. But I think even beyond that, and I think we both talked about this, even with adults who have had surgeries and said, you know, look, when I decided this, I didn't have the proper counseling or something like this. You're going to see a lot of lawsuits. And the American Medical Association released a statement basically saying, look, we're not going to be able to do this. This is going to be a problem when it comes to surgeries. When you're teaching, and this is the thing, is that you're going to indoctrinate through these teachings and then set out into the world a new group of doctors, nurse practitioners, physicians, assistants, and everybody else that will be in charge of people's care, that will be using language that doesn't make sense to the average person, that comes straight from the agenda, that comes straight from the indoctrination itself. And when you do that, it becomes dangerous. Biological male, living as a woman, transgender female, biological male, all of these things have to be very clear in the medical field because there you can't change them and again this is why i have the problem with what were you assigned what gender were you assigned at birth assigned doesn't belong

00:47:24 - 00:47:33 | Speaker 2:

there someone don't you like someone just don't you have to ask the question who's doing the Who's doing the assignment?

00:47:35 - 00:49:09 | Speaker 1:

My creator assigned it. Oh, bring that up in a liberal university. Good luck with that. And those are the things, you know, that come down to it, that it comes down to. There are no anomalies, you know, or there are, well, maybe a few anomalies out there um when it comes to science there are very few anomalies but when you're talking when you're talking about teaching science not with chromosomes no but when you're talking about teaching science but i mean in medical and you know in general you know and you make in fact you make a case for any anomaly along the way, right? Those would be special cases, which may require special treatment or not. This is what they're going out of their way to make it look like biologically these are anomalies. And they are not. They are agenda. They are indeed a social construct. They are coming up with their version, whatever their version is. You know, a pregnant person came in.

00:49:10 - 00:49:33 | Speaker 2:

No, but you just hit it right there where they contradict themselves. Yes. Because we were told for the longest time that gender is a social construct. Right. Which means it's not biological. Right. Exactly. This is a social, socially we have decided to do this. Right. Well, have you scientifically? No. Well, are you a scientist or a sociologist? That's it.

00:49:33 - 00:49:54 | Speaker 1:

Because in science, they're applying a social construct. Right. And it does not apply in science. It's just. You know, it reminds me of the, you know, the Earth First video that we've played. And the girl goes, you know, give me that life that that rock over there has lived.

00:49:54 - 00:49:57 | Speaker 2:

What a wonderful life that rock has lived.

00:49:57 - 00:50:09 | Speaker 1:

What a wonderful life that rock has lived. And I think to myself, you know, sometimes I kind of have a boring life and the rock may have had more, at least the rock gets outside once in a while.

00:50:09 - 00:50:16 | Speaker 2:

No, I'm going to defend my life and say my life is more interesting than a rock. I'll take that strong stand.

00:50:16 - 00:50:40 | Speaker 1:

Yours is. I wouldn't bet on mine on certain days. The rock doesn't talk to a cat like I do. I've watched every video on YouTube three times. I've finished YouTube. No, but I mean, it's like saying, you know, that rock could identify as a tree.

00:50:43 - 00:52:05 | Speaker 2:

Just ridiculous. But that's a beautiful thing, how they contradict themselves. But you and I do not live in the bubble of today because you and I both remember when the argument was gender is not sex right and all of a sudden one day and i i'm serious it happened in like a month oh all of a sudden yeah gender was sex it's like wait a minute you've just reversed yourself 180 degrees it didn't matter yeah it didn't matter and i go by that thing that i read the other day from the the one guy who wrote about the radical transgender movement that basically it's the ultimate power play you actually attempt to brainwash people that what is scientifically impossible is possible without any evidence to back it up and you shame and demonize the people that won't agree with your absurdity right and then you wish to change society by something that is so incredibly ridiculous and self-evident right yeah and it's just wow no i mean it's it and

00:52:05 - 00:52:37 | Speaker 1:

that's it um and they say it as if it's true and then the next phase is shaming you if you don't use the language you heard it in a way in some of these responses here in the audio you just played the idea is and they're not going to answer the question but if they were on their territory if they were in their setting on their turf they would condemn you for even questioning

00:52:37 - 00:54:22 | Speaker 2:

this policy i have it here transgenderism the radical transgender movement is An uncontrolled, society-scaled experiment in which conformity and obedience attest of how far you can make people parrot absurdities, inflict cruelties, collude with unrealities, and ostracize and punish people for things that they do not themselves believe. It is a test whether the moral self-abasements and routine betrayals that occurred in the Soviet bloc with its secret police and political prisons and armies of informants could be replicated in a liberal, democratic, and pluralistic society that lacked this formal apparatus of repression. Whether minor rewards and punishments could force people to punish people for stating the most self-evident of all truths and inspire them to cheer on the chemical castration and dismemberment of their own children. It is a test of whether civil liberties organizations could be twisted into instruments of state repression and human rights groups, instruments of defamation and violence against women. It is a test that most of the Western world is failing. I thought that was just a wonderful way to wrap it up in a couple of paragraphs. Yep. and that Wesley Yang, and he's a writer on Substack. Don't know anything else about him, but I'm telling you, that's almost perfect.

00:54:23 - 00:54:48 | Speaker 1:

Yeah, yeah. I mean, again, the more we allow this nonsense, because you're shredding the truth is what you're doing. If we can change that, if anything can be a social construct, everything can be a social construct as we've said before though and this is where the right

00:54:48 - 00:54:59 | Speaker 2:

has to attack it this is not about caring about transgenders they could give a damn no there's a mental health crisis that they that they themselves they promote they're admitting there's a they are

00:55:00 - 00:55:24 | Speaker 5:

as we have said there's a huge mental health crisis yes we go back to the berkeley professor right uh uh going up against the uh josh holly josh holly uh that that point uh that you can't even talk about this why right because they'll commit suicide if you do right if you even talk about transgenderism there's a mental health issue here you can't say that right you know it's like

00:55:24 - 00:55:28 | Speaker 6:

they're trying to shut down the conversation they're trying to shut down the conversation

00:55:28 - 00:55:40 | Speaker 5:

The biggest lie is that they give a damn about people that have these thoughts that they're the opposite sex. They don't give a damn about them. No, they don't. They could care less about them. We are Red Eye Radio.

00:55:41 - 00:55:49 | Speaker 2:

This morning's USDA Farm Report is brought to you by Howl's Products. Tested, trusted, guaranteed since 1920.

00:55:49 - 00:55:58 | Speaker 4:

A trail of record-setting heat continues this week. USDA meteorologist Brad Rippey says this wave originated last week.

00:55:58 - 00:56:17 | Speaker 3:

We started to see heat emerging from the western United States and it really took hold across the northern Great Plains over the weekend, peaking on Sunday and now as we move through this week, some of that heat is propagating eastward across the northern Corn Belt, the Great Lakes region and then eventually reaching the northeastern and middle Atlantic states.

00:56:17 - 00:56:22 | Speaker 4:

The peak of this heat wave Sunday, a near all-time record high temperature for the state.

00:56:23 - 00:56:32 | Speaker 3:

of Montana. Luckily, some of that heat has lost a little bit of punch, but that doesn't change the fact that you're approaching the midweek. You're looking at temperatures in the 95 to 100

00:56:32 - 00:56:48 | Speaker 4:

degree range. Rippey says the heat should not impact Midwestern corn and soybeans this week. He adds, ironically, near to below normal temperatures are forecasted along a stretch of the nation's southern tier. I'm Rod Bain reporting for the U.S. Department of Agriculture

00:56:48 - 00:56:55 | Speaker 6:

in washington dc this report brought to you by cenex fuels and lubes get in touch with red eye

00:56:55 - 00:56:59 | Speaker 1:

radio toll free at 866-90-RED-EYE

00:56:59 - 00:57:58 | Speaker 5:

we are red eye radio he's hurt calling i'm gary mcnamara welcome and uh and and good morning but i you know you and i were just talking about during the break that and and i one of the things i'd said and you you've always agreed with it uh is is that the the right has to go after the left on this whole thing that they care about transgenders they don't they don't give a damn they don't give a damn about women we've seen that no with the misogyny and sexism of the radical transgender movement but they also don't care about transgenders because they themselves if You listen to what they say, say there's an incredible mental health problem with transgenders, and the solution of it is to let children cut off their body parts. Yes, and not talk about the mental health crisis itself.

00:57:58 - 00:58:01 | Speaker 6:

Yes. Wow, that's unacceptable.

00:58:11 - 00:58:13 | Speaker 5:

Jim Rome takes on sports.

00:58:13 - 00:58:39 | Speaker 7:

I will always have a complicated relationship with this game, but people evolve. So do sports. Do not make me regret this. Do not make me devolve back to that guy that so many clones wish that I still was. And do not embarrass the entire country. Now, I can go back. I can get there fast. Lose tonight, and you got a real problem. Do not blow it. The Jim Rohn Show podcast. You've been warned. Follow and listen on your favorite platform.

00:58:43 - 00:59:00 | Speaker 1:

Catch Red Eye Radio live every night on the Red Eye Radio app. Available in the App Store. Red. Radio.

00:59:01 - 00:59:10 | Speaker 5:

And I'm Gary McNamara along with Eric Harley. Well, the Democrat Socialists of America are being very clear about what they want. We'll get to that in just a minute.

00:59:10 - 01:00:00 | Speaker 6:

When it comes to supplements, two things matter the most, that it works and that you can trust it. But rather than just tell you about Relief Factor, let's share a story from another great customer. Doug took Relief Factor for nearly a year before convincing a wife, a special needs teacher, to try it. Now, she had been using assistance to move through the long hallway at school. Now, she's back on her feet every day and never had to leave the job she loves. That's a wonderful story. Doug thank you for sharing and our best to you and your wife and I'm telling you right now they gave me some to try and the difference is day and night I used to have to work around my pain sometimes it couldn't work at all because of my pain and thanks to Relief Factor it's no longer an issue and we want to tell your story about Relief.

01:00:00 - 01:00:19 | Speaker 2:

factor and get you started the three-week quick start is just 1776 and all you do is go to relieffactor.com or call 800 the number four relief 800 for relief and connect with a friendly local team that's going to get you back to the life you love and maybe we'll be sharing your

01:00:19 - 01:01:06 | Speaker 3:

story soon relieffactor.com you know eric i don't know what happened last week the democrat social of america must have put it into print because when we were on vacation last week all of a sudden there's a news story all over the place here's what the democrat socialists of america want yeah and i'm thinking to myself as i'm on vacation last week we talked about this two weeks ago right it seemed old and i think this was because of the convention that they held oh they had the convention and so it came out what they wanted and that was reported yeah and then it must have come out in print because i was like deja vu didn't we do this story well now they're all publicizing it this is uh the uh democrat socialist of america co-chair uh ashik sadiq okay uh on getting rid of the senate you ready here we go all right we just don't see the point

01:01:06 - 01:01:36 | Speaker 1:

of the senate um historically it was meant to serve very wealthy people who owned a lot of land and that's still a system that we have today and and it it's something we we would change we would expand what what the house of representatives does and and make it more actually representative of people who who live in this country so would you like to abolish the senate that's that's part of our platform and we don't think that's extreme we think it's it's a a change that would help make

01:01:36 - 01:02:06 | Speaker 3:

this country more democratic uh now uh the i i just love it isn't extreme to them by the way No. That's the whole point. It's not extreme. Now, let's continue about socialism, the general concept of socialism, and then we'll give our analysis of this. But here we go. The same guy, Sheikh Sadiq, on the propaganda of socialism. Okay, here we go.

01:02:06 - 01:02:54 | Speaker 1:

So there's been a lot of propaganda since the Cold War and red scares in the United States where very powerful people in the United States felt threatened by the by the politics we represent. So that's why, you know, a lot of people never learned about the history of democratic socialists in the United States and that it was organized workers who pushed for things like a 40 hour work week or ending child labor. And these are things that are part of the legacy of democratic socialism in this country. And that's really against nationalism and fascism. So even the label of national socialism that the Nazis used at the time was intentionally meant to trick people. And it worked at the time, unfortunately, in Germany. But that's why we have to emphasize the democratic part of what we're talking about today.

01:02:55 - 01:04:41 | Speaker 3:

So what are they talking about? To get through all the mumbo-jumbo, what is he talking about? What they're trying to sell is the tyranny of the majority, which the founding fathers recognized. What they're trying to say, because remember, they want to get rid of the Senate. And then they wish to get rid of the executive branch and the Supreme Court being separate bodies of the federal government. And everything would be under the authority of the House. The Senate would be gone. the house would be population only we viewed as population only and and at that particular point any of your rights could be taken away if the population the majority of the people wanted your rights to be taken away and what rights property rights that's what they're after they're after the government socialism is about the the the government taking over companies yep that's what it's about that's what socialism is whether it happens through the power of the people to say we're going to take your property and we're going to nationalize these businesses the result is the same whether it's a dictator or whether it's the popular vote the founding fathers recognized that they knew it back then and that's the fallacy of mr sadiq that's what he doesn't want to tell you because what they're saying is we'll do it through if the majority of the population wishes to take away your property well it's the democratic process

01:04:41 - 01:05:28 | Speaker 2:

that's doing it yeah the people are being represented right and the fact is is again the tyranny of the majority and the mob rules right and next thing you know you get into this populist thing because then we have to think about the willfully ignorant the the majority you know and and and it is a number of people that where just pick any issue that's on the table well shouldn't the government you know the big one shouldn't the government own these businesses nobody has a right to own your home no one has a right to own these apartment complexes

01:05:28 - 01:05:42 | Speaker 1:

Well, that's where you get into socialism, which is, again, the government control, again, the means of production, which means they control the government, owns the industry, and then you go to communism where there is no private property that is allowed at all.

01:05:42 - 01:07:52 | Speaker 2:

Well, because what are the first big targets, you know, energy, things that we require to live, energy, food. Now, the left will argue that, you know, in terms of air conditioning, you don't need air conditioning, but energy. they they they recognize now the thing is is because with their whole stupid wind and solar powered program you won't be able to have air conditioning and you just won't get the job done but they'll come in with the big ones that they've been trying to nationalize for a long time and they are energy and of course uh the the entire medical field uh medicine and health care are those are the two massive chunks of the economy that they believe they should and the way they sell it is well nobody should be making a dime off of your health care remember we got the uh nobody should be making a dime off of uh food no nobody should make a dime off of uh water they even you know we had the argument well your city charges you for water it's you know all the process you shouldn't be charging for water you shouldn't be charging for health care nobody should make a dime off these things and then what's next well our our logical step back then was well food you need food every day and then well that's right nobody should make a dime off of corporations this is where you get into the mom domi mom domi effect and that is you know the government in that in that case the city owning grocery stores and then you spread you know you're trying to get this mentality of the willfully ignorant in the direction of yeah that's Right. We have a right to food. We have a right to health care. We have a right to energy. We have a right to property. So think about that. Shelter, food, energy, health care. Those things, those major items is what they would target in terms of nationalizing those if they were to get that kind of item.

01:07:52 - 01:08:03 | Speaker 1:

What you meant is they have a right to your property. Exactly. You said you have a right. Right, right, because remember, the communists, the socialists, communists don't want private ownership.

01:08:04 - 01:08:14 | Speaker 2:

Right, yeah, that's my whole point, is that they have a right, so they want to control shelter, food, health care, and energy.

01:08:14 - 01:09:59 | Speaker 1:

And then when he talks about that the Senate was just for rich people, it wasn't. the Founding Fathers recognized that you needed to have representation. States need to have, and this is the whole thing. It's never, we're never going to get rid of the Senate. It's not going to happen. It's not going to happen. But it's interesting to talk about because it's, why does the Senate exist? Because you have these liberals out there saying, well, we're going to get rid of the Senate. You think Vermont wants to get rid of their representation in the Senate? right you think new hampshire rhode island right maine right wants to give up their two senators right they lose any type of clowder representation in the government and the senate was set up to ensure that's why you have bicameral legislators throughout the western world whether it's a parliamentary system or a representative government system like we have a constitutional republic with a stronger executive branch that's why it that that's why it exists it exists because the founding fathers understood because they revolted over what taxation without representation they knew it and when you do it and the beautiful part is when you see what the futurists are saying that where the population is going to grow texas and florida are going to dominate 75 years from now if everything continues the same yeah California is going to be a blip when it comes to the increase in the population people are going to move south they're going to move which is why the desperation of CNBC well

01:10:00 - 01:10:36 | Speaker 3:

By all liberal standards, the worst states are the red states. We'll get to that here in Lincoln. I think National Review did an article on that. It was like, oh, my God. It's so bad. But you said it yesterday. They're desperate. They've got to put stuff out there because they know people are moving and they're trying to keep people from moving. You know the best part is the number of people from Florida, Texas, and Tennessee that said, we are the worst states. don't come here yeah oh no it's horrible i love that it's horrible here in texas it's horrible

01:10:36 - 01:12:55 | Speaker 2:

in texas don't come here i'll tell you what's horrible is the traffic from all the people coming here but it's no you think about that and i remember robert reich on social media uh uh putting on uh this is this goes back i don't know how many years but um the uh it was three four five years ago but he was making he was going on a rant about the senate i don't know if he used wyoming as as the example because wyoming's got fewer than 600 000 people they only have one house seat right um and that used to be liz cheney occupied that that seat um but they have two senators why do they get two and california only has two that was his argument i'm not sure if it It was Wyoming. I'm pretty sure it was, but it was basically a, you know, very low population state, relatively speaking to California. And California only gets two senators. This is the problem, and this is what they believe. But you look at the number of House seats in California as opposed to the one in Wyoming. And, of course, you know, you look at the, okay, well, that's the representation. over in the house and the district is just happens to be the entire state in wyoming those but those ideas and we have said for the longest time in fact we may have to claim today on our 21st anniversary as a team together oh that's right i forgot yeah yeah july 15th what are we doing we should be worse where's the alcohol yeah we don't have any bourbon ron brought muffins yeah producer ron brought muffins so we have muffins poppy seeds yeah seinfeld episode right no because we'll get tested if we eat poppy seeds no but you know they but it's you know you look at that that entire equation right um and and we said back in the day you need to own what you actually want and now they do and it's been published they had their convention yep now they're out there promoting it they're saying this isn't radical of course it is these things aren't going

01:12:55 - 01:13:04 | Speaker 1:

to happen this is what they're pushing for though we are red eye radio coming up more with gary mcdemara and eric harley it's red eye radio

01:13:20 - 01:14:47 | Speaker 3:

We are Red Eye Radio. He is Eric Carley, and I'm Gary McNamara. But the Democratic Socialists of America, when you see what they wish to do, there were two things, two of the most main points of the Constitution. One was the separation of powers, which is where power cannot accumulate in one area. Right. And so that's why, number one, you've got the legislative branch, the judicial branch and the executive branch. They want to put the executive branch and the Supreme Court under the judicial branch, under the legislative branch, which would just be the House with no Senate. Yeah. So what they're saying is all the power in our society should be by popular vote. which the founding fathers didn't want because keeping the power from accumulating in one area was absolutely critical to them. And the Senate is part of that. The Senate is part of keeping the legislative branch from having too much power because the Bill of Rights is the other core part of it, which just doesn't matter what the popular vote is. Bill of Rights still stays. Right.

01:14:53 - 01:14:57 | Speaker 1:

This is Red Eye Radio on Westwood One.

01:14:58 - 01:14:59 | Speaker 3:

USAA knows dynamic duos.

01:15:00 - 01:15:11 | Speaker 1:

can save the day like superheroes and sidekicks or auto and home insurance with usaa you can bundle your auto and home and save up to 10 tap the banner to learn more and get a quote at usaa.com

01:15:11 - 01:15:17 | Speaker 4:

slash bundle restrictions apply the united states soccer federation presents the u.s soccer podcast

01:15:17 - 01:15:23 | Speaker 3:

the place where i megan klingerberg a world cup expert teaches you everything that you need to

01:15:23 - 01:15:36 | Speaker 2:

know for this summer's world cup how special is it that we've been able to follow this young group of guys. It's been such a roller coaster of emotions. You can feel the intensity. Quite a bit of time, energy, effort, everything along the way on these guys making the country proud and I think

01:15:36 - 01:15:42 | Speaker 4:

they will this summer. The U.S. Soccer Podcast. Presented by Henkel. Follow and listen on your favorite platform.

0/0