Yeah, although I think—well, whatever. I don't know enough about it. I actually think Washington's legislature had a really busy session, actually. But whatever. In this particular case, though, the the these two kind of competing bills were similar, but only one aspect of them were competing. But it had to do with establishing broadband in parts of the of the state where there isn't broadband and like kind of letting local governments establish broadband there. And there's just like one part of it that is different, but both of them are pretty good bills. Right. So they both come to the governor's desk. Usually if the House has a bill and the Senate has a bill, they would reconcile them. Right. And then send them to the governor to sign. But this time, for whatever reason, I don't know why the legislature didn't reconcile them and they just sent two bills, the House bill and the Senate bill, the House bill being just kind of slightly broader. OK, maybe slightly more aggressive. And so they both end up on the governor's desk. Now, he has several choices, right? He can probably most governors would send them back and just say, figure it out. Send me a bill and I will sign it. He could have done that. He could have just signed one and rejected the other. He even though – and this is where the two-pen thing comes in – he could have signed them both, but whichever one he signed second would officially have precedent because it was the – it would be the latest bill. Yeah, and the law is the most recent bill takes precedent over older laws, right? I should say laws, not bills there. So he has all – he also could have just like vetoed them both, like whatever, but no point in doing that. But what he decides to do, instead of doing any of those things, he decides, I don't even want to take the more passive approach and sign one and then the other, because that's making too much of a decision here. He literally put a pen, he's right-handed, he put a pen in his right hand and his left hand and signed them both at the same exact time so that he did not have to choose one over the other. Now, of course, the editorial was slamming him for this, saying that's not exactly great leadership. And I tend to agree. I like Jay Inslee. I don't usually like the editorial board of the Seattle Times. I've been looking around for a statement from his office about why he made this decision. I couldn't find it. I just kind of got deeper and deeper into these two broadband bills, which we don't want to do here. But is that not fascinating? The Secretary of State, Kim Wyman, so now it's her job to put these laws in the books, and she doesn't know which one to put first and which one to put second, the second one having more precedent. And so she sues the governor's office and the court just, I think, kicked it back to her in the past couple of days and said, I think they didn't they didn't even rule on it. They just said, we're not taking this up. Kim Wyman, secretary of state, you deal with this. And what she ended up doing was she put in the bill that came. She put them in order in which they came out of their respective houses.