Yeah, I don't think they had bad blood I don't know. I mean, to me, I mean, again, my take is very tired on day two. But to me, it's just him. It's just Paul McCartney has a huge ego. And I just think he has an opportunity to get more headlines. So he's going to try to get more headlines. And I think he knows this is provocative. And, you know, I mean, what he's doing is he's comparing the the it sounds like what he's doing is he's comparing the entire discography of the Beatles to the early days of the Rolling Stones. Whereas they were both coming out of, like, a very, you know, much different strip down. I mean, not to get nerdy, but I guess, you know, the Beatles were coming out of something that was more like Skiffle. They called Skiffle at the time, which had some elements, I think, of, like, kind of R&B and rock and roll, what would become rock and roll. Whereas, yeah, the Stones came out of a more strict, bluesy rock and roll background. But they both evolved. And then the Beatles got into, you know, psychedelics and all of that scene. But the the the stones played around in that space, too. I don't know. Yeah. To me, it's like I'm not saying that there's no truth in what he's saying with more context. And there might even be more context to this quote. But it does seem doesn't it just seem like Paul McCartney is like, hey, can I get near Kanye West? What was this like 10 years ago now? Can I get near Kanye West and just like give him a riff for a song so that everybody's talking me talking about me again? I feel like Paul McCartney really has issues of relevance. The idea if he ever stopped being relevant, I think he would just turn to dust.