I mean, it's this guy, Luka Doncic, who was a Dallas Maverick and a really, really good player, and he gets traded to the Lakers for, well, there was a bunch of, I think there was maybe three teams involved, but he ends up as a Laker. Yeah, the Jazz was kind of a bank shot. And then the Lakers end up losing their center, Anthony Davis, who's a really good player in his own right, but is older than Luka Doncic. Luka Doncic is 25 years old, considered to be in the prime of his career, and just a really, really kind of, like, you know, generational talent who's always apparently loved LeBron James' game and emulated him. There's this huge mutual respect and appreciation between the two of them. It's also Los Angeles. It's, you know, kind of other than maybe the Knicks. It's obviously the biggest basketball market. So I still, I mean, to me it's like, yeah, okay, you just had basically one of the best players in the NBA, Luka Doncic, just get shipped by his team. It made no sense based in the way that these kind of blockbuster things usually unfold, which is that the player is unhappy. They're asking to go somewhere or it just it came so out of the blue. But again, the way that the sports media world that I tend to engage with is response. It's just extra surreal to me because unlike if this was a football trade, I would have at least they wouldn't be good thoughts, but I would have some thoughts. I would understand instinctively that, like, oh, like, if the Kansas City Chiefs traded for Josh Allen, but they still had Patrick Mahomes, I would be like, well, okay, why? You have a good quarterback. I don't even know that. Like, I don't know what the need in the backcourt is of Luka Doncic for the Lakers. In other words, I don't I don't know the X's and O's of this. What I know is that people like Brian Windhorst are saying it's the biggest trade in the history of America of American sports now.