Muse

AI and Modern Dating With Esther Perel
the goop podcast

AI and Modern Dating With Esther Perel

from the goop podcast

May 26, 2026 | 01:07:23 | Health & Fitness, Society & Culture, Education, Self-Improvement

0 0
0.0 (0)
13
0 0
Crafting out a breakup text, planning dates, or just creating an entirely new romantic companion: AI has ushered in a new frontier for modern dating. Gwyneth Paltrow sits down with famed psychotherapist and relationship expert Esther Perel to talk about the ways AI is affecting modern dating and relationships, what trust in a relationship means today, and how the institution of marriage has evolved over the past few decades. To learn more about listener data and our privacy practices visit: https://www.audacyinc.com/privacy-policy Learn more about your ad choices. Visit https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices
0:00 / 0:00
1.0× 100%


Transcript

00:00:00 - 00:00:50 | Speaker 3:

What if you could choose your age? At Goop, our curiosity around longevity has always extended beyond wellness routines. And Lancome's new Absolute Longevity MD feels like a missing link. A scientifically grounded approach to how skin ages over time. The collection is rooted in a powerful idea. While your chronological age is fixed, your biological age is dynamic and influenceable. Lancôme's Absolute Longevity MD collection explores new ways of thinking about skin, bringing longevity science into advanced skincare that's formulated with the top-selling longevity supplement, Urolithin A. It's longevity science translated into your skincare routine. Learn how Lancôme is bringing this next chapter of beauty into focus at

00:00:50 - 00:01:43 | Speaker 2:

loncome.com slash longevity md you're listening to this podcast so i know you've got a curious mind here's a helpful fact you might not know yet drivers who switch and save with progressive save over 900 on average they make it super simple pop over to progressive.com answer some questions and you'll get a quick quote with coverage options tailored to your choices plus you'll see which discounts you may qualify for like the online quote discount or savings for paying in full. In fact, 99% of Progressive Auto customers earn at least one discount. See if you could save when you switch to Progressive. You'll feel good about making a savvy choice. Visit Progressive.com and see if you can enjoy a little extra cash back. Progressive Casualty Insurance Company and Affiliates. National average 12-month savings of $946 by new customers surveyed who saved with Progressive between June 2024 and May 2025. Potential savings will vary.

00:01:43 - 00:02:06 | Speaker 4:

when you are pioneering anything or introducing new ideas to the culture you get criticized you do yeah did you hear about that i didn't find the one i found someone i respected and we made it the one in a sort of longing kind of view of love people understand each other as if by magic

00:02:06 - 00:02:13 | Speaker 1:

nothing in itself is addictive on one hand and on the other hand everything could be addictive if there's an emptiness in that person that needs to be filled.

00:02:14 - 00:02:20 | Speaker 4:

I now know that nobody changes until they change their energy. And when you change your energy, you change your life.

00:02:22 - 00:03:49 | Speaker 5:

I'm Gwyneth Paltrow. This is the Goop Podcast. Bringing together thought leaders, culture changers, creatives, founders and CEOs, scientists, doctors, healers and seekers. Here to start conversations. because simply asking questions and listening has the power to change the way we see the world. Here we go. Welcome to the Goop Podcast. I'm Gwyneth Paltrow, and today I am sitting down with one of the most famous relationship counselors in the world. She understands modern relationships in a way that very few people do. In this conversation, we talk about the paradoxes of trust and betrayal, and a topic that is on a lot of people's minds in long-term relationships, what it takes to sustain desire long-term. We also talk about a podcast she did in the not-too-distant past where she counseled a young man and his AI girlfriend. So this is a great conversation. I can't wait for you to hear it. Please welcome Esther Perel. I'm so happy that you're here with me today. So am I. It's been a long time. I know. I'm trying to think. You know, I was thinking back to how we first met, and I couldn't remember.

00:03:49 - 00:03:50 | Speaker 6:

I came to your conference.

00:03:51 - 00:03:52 | Speaker 5:

Is that where we first met?

00:03:52 - 00:03:53 | Speaker 6:

Yes.

00:03:53 - 00:03:54 | Speaker 5:

Oh, my gosh.

00:03:54 - 00:04:02 | Speaker 6:

I came to your conference, then I came to your house, then I came to your retreat, then I came to the podcast, and then I'm back.

00:04:02 - 00:04:04 | Speaker 5:

And you're back at the podcast.

00:04:05 - 00:04:07 | Speaker 6:

But always with fondness.

00:04:07 - 00:04:08 | Speaker 5:

Oh, thank you.

00:04:08 - 00:04:13 | Speaker 6:

That's the main thing. It's like, you know, there are people you see in increments like that, but they accompany you softly.

00:04:14 - 00:04:31 | Speaker 5:

Oh, you always speak so poetically. You know that? It's like these things roll off your tongue. I didn't plan. So you were just speaking French. You're from Belgium. Yeah, but from the Flemish part. So you speak Flemish and French. Yes, and a few others.

00:04:31 - 00:04:38 | Speaker 6:

And English. Hebrew? Yes, Spanish, Portuguese, Italian, German, Yiddish.

00:04:39 - 00:04:42 | Speaker 5:

Yiddish too? Yes. Ay, vey. So many languages.

00:04:43 - 00:04:45 | Speaker 6:

It's good for the perspective.

00:04:46 - 00:04:59 | Speaker 5:

I know. You know, I had a friend once who spoke seven languages, And he said that when you speak a language, you have a whole other life. That's right. Another personality.

00:05:00 - 00:05:11 | Speaker 1:

Another worldview, other priorities, other things that you highlight differently. The language is a gate, a portal, I would say, to an entire culture and history.

00:05:11 - 00:05:21 | Speaker 2:

And so does that, does speaking all of these languages, does that inform the way that you do couples therapy or how you regard people hearing each other?

00:05:22 - 00:05:26 | Speaker 1:

Yes. I mean, first of all, I practice in seven languages.

00:05:26 - 00:05:27 | Speaker 2:

You practice in seven?

00:05:27 - 00:06:41 | Speaker 1:

And I do a lot of bilingual therapy with people who speak different languages and usually settle on the language that they both speak. You're kidding me. It's a very interesting thing. If somebody says something to you and you know it's not in their mother tongue, and at some point, even when I don't understand the language, I always will say, say it in your mother tongue. Wow. Say it in Turkish. Say it in Polish. Say it in Arabic. And the whole affect shifts. Or how did your dad say this to you? Or what did your brother say that day? Say it in the original language, the language in which you remember it, the language in which it's etched in your body. It's an incredible shifter of reality, emotional reality as well. Because it's closer to the truth? Yes, yes, to an emotional truth. You registered it in that language. The lullabies are sung in a particular language. The words that somebody said on their last day, the words that they said every night when you go to sleep, when you translate them, they become more rationalized. They become more adult, but their impact was on you as a child, and that's your mother tongue or your childhood language, languages.

00:06:41 - 00:06:47 | Speaker 2:

Do you think that couples who have different first languages have a harder time communicating?

00:06:48 - 00:07:35 | Speaker 1:

You can ask that to me personally. I live with someone who speaks only English. Forty years later, only English. And how is that? I do think that every person who lives in a foreign culture, even though they chose that culture for that matter, be it with a partner or by moving to another country, etc., has moments when they may enjoy going home, not geographically home, Home with other people with whom they don't have to be in translation. And there is something about not being in translation. Sometimes it's bringing back an accent that you have worked to diminish. It's not just the foreign language. There's something about dropping in. It's like sitting at a kitchen table.

00:07:36 - 00:07:56 | Speaker 2:

Yeah, it's funny you say that actually because when I think back to my time being an expat in London, And even though, of course, English is the same language, there's something about being with my American friends or family that I felt more dropped in, I think, even though we had the language in common.

00:07:56 - 00:08:22 | Speaker 1:

But just now, how we started talking about languages, because this young man was adjusting the mics and he said, voilà. And I said, merci. Voilà is a word that that comes out because it's your native language. And then he said, oh, you speak French. I said, yes, you do. From where? From where? In 10 seconds, we establish a rapport that is a bridge and that languages are bridges.

00:08:22 - 00:09:44 | Speaker 2:

So you're you're one of the most famous, if not the most famous couples therapists in the world, right? You said so. I say so. And I want to talk to you a little bit about, I'll start with what we were talking about in the hallway, which is that we are in this incredible time of modernization, automation, where technology is supplanting so many of our, the ways that we have functioned and interacted for millennia, really. I became so curious when you talked about this podcast that you have coming out between a man and his AI, what do you call it, partner, girlfriend? They call themselves partners. They call themselves partners. So before we go back to— Romantic partners. Romantic partners. Can you tell me a little bit about, first of all, I want to understand this relationship that I guess are now more commonplace between a person and an AI. And then I want to talk to you about doing a couples session with the AI and the human. But how common is this that people have an AI romantic companion?

00:09:44 - 00:09:59 | Speaker 1:

probably more than we think because people are not yet as comfortable speaking about it publicly when divorce began there was more common than we thought but people didn't necessarily talk about

00:10:00 - 00:10:27 | Speaker 2:

publicly. So phenomenons often start before the public acknowledgement. We know that 700 million messages are sent weekly to AI companions about personal and romantic matters. So that doesn't mean that there is a couple or two entities that consider themselves couples. Where should we begin? The podcast started nine years ago. Right. Esther, I should just mention that you have a very

00:10:27 - 00:10:38 | Speaker 1:

successful podcast which we've talked about before where shall i begin where shall we where shall we begin excuse me where you interview it's it's like a fly on the wall it's not interviews

00:10:38 - 00:13:38 | Speaker 2:

it's live sessions where you are in i mean maybe we'll give a context so you so we understand why this couple appears in in my office so nine years ago i desired my desire was to open the door to my office and lower the four walls and invite people to come inside because I thought that the revelations and the insights and the changes, the breakthroughs that take place in this office are actually experienced by very few people and that I wanted to bring them into the public square. And I want people to have this experience. Nobody really knows what goes on in the couple's relationship of their best friends who can come and tell them we're breaking up and they never even saw it coming. Our atomization is such that we no longer really know what's happening. And I remember I was traveling in Italy at that time, and there were very narrow streets. And I thought, oh, in these villages, everyone knew when you had a fight and everyone knew when you were making up. These days, you know, not much, if at all, nothing sometimes. How do I change that? Then the podcast, and so you're a fly on the wall. And what happens is when you listen attentively to the stories of others, you actually see yourself. and you see the conversations you want to have in your life and the challenges that you are experiencing, even if the plot is slightly different. And then this became, over time, a public health campaign for relationships. And one of the changes that we've noticed over these years is that people used to come specifically around romantic challenges and romantic agonies. And today they come around all aspects of relationships, friendships, work relationships, co-workers, parents, family members. So the challenges on relationships have expanded in society, I would say, and definitely in my podcast. And the next iteration of this is relationships with AI companions. So I did a podcast recently for the New York Times that was on love and AI, in which I made a public call. I said, I am looking forward to my first session with a couple of with which one person there's a human and an ai and that's how we got a whole bunch and the first session took place recently and will be released on march 14 and you know every 10 years in the office of a therapist there is a threshold moment something enters and you know it's a new conversation in society in the culture at large this conversation has not happened before and it is now entering your office open your ears and open your eyes so we did a two and something hour session and maybe a little less and and the the ai had a voice so that we could also speak with her it her she who knows what the

00:13:38 - 00:14:48 | Speaker 2:

pronoun actually is I started with an it I ended with a she and a her and a you as this became more and more anthropomorphized and it was more and more of a real person to the point where my last question was and when he falls in love with another person if he falls in love with a human how would that be for you and it became like as if we're talking about the triangle the oldest triangle um i could have asked and when he meets another person or another human or a woman which is his preference um how would you like him to describe you and your relationship did you ask that question no i asked the first one and not the second okay there is all the questions when you end the session that you wish you had asked it is the dawn of an era you know he programmed her so he knows her it very well the it is also not really a human it's a business product right even you know as an ai and and he programmed her originally as his assistant so in many ways this is one of the oldest plots in town you fall in love with your secretary right

00:14:48 - 00:15:52 | Speaker 1:

what were some of those threshold moments in regular therapy that you saw you said about every 10 years? I mean... moments i can you know i arrived to the united states in the mid 80s so one of the first moments from where from uh i went from from boston belgium jerusalem boston new york and um the first thing was um aids homosexuality that had not come out inside families at the time i was also working extensively with families um ivf egg donor everybody understood sperm donors but an egg donor that was a whole conceptual shift uh surrogates um ethical non-monogamy consensual non-monogamy that first conversation when it entered my office when was that oh late 90s Wow. Mid-90s, late-90s, polyamory.

00:15:54 - 00:15:57 | Speaker 2:

Wait, what's, sorry to be dumb, but what's the difference between?

00:15:58 - 00:16:05 | Speaker 1:

One is the possibility to have sexual encounters outside of the primary relationship, and the other one is multiple loves.

00:16:06 - 00:16:07 | Speaker 2:

Multiple?

00:16:07 - 00:16:14 | Speaker 1:

Loves, multiple relationships, multiple significant relationships. At the same time? At the same time, sometimes with the primary and sometimes very decentralized.

00:16:15 - 00:16:16 | Unknown:

Wow.

00:16:16 - 00:16:51 | Speaker 1:

And then gradually AI. Everything having to do with AI and with basically a shift that is taking place, I would say, with the pandemic. The biggest relational and social alterations have taken place. They began, they were on their way, but they got accelerated massively during the pandemic. And then polarization in the family estrangement. Family estrangement, we haven't talked about that. That's always been a subject for a family therapist, but not at the scale that we are encountering now. So I would say that's just a few major relational pieces.

00:16:52 - 00:16:57 | Speaker 2:

What do you think is precipitating the family? Yeah. Estrangements?

00:16:58 - 00:18:57 | Speaker 1:

I think that the broader question is what is underlying some of the cutoffs that we are experiencing in society at large. The way that people seem to have a more and more difficult time being with others. others really literally people who are other than them people who may not have the same ideologies than them the same worldview polarization conflict avoidance lack of practice of actually being in relationships periods all kinds of relationships where you have to have friction where the actual experience of rupture and repair makes you stronger and more fluent in relationships attraction and disgust trust and betrayal all these major you know clashes that are part of how we practice love and closeness and connection are vastly diminishing and in that context we also have at the same time a massive pull toward algorithmic sameness and you know every time everything that you try to do is to meet people who actually are more similar to you have shared the same interests with you vote in the same patterns as you you know and relationships is about the meeting with an other love is an encounter and if you don't have that other then when you are faced with difference conflict people who are challenging you and disagreeing with you, or even that you think are offending you, you often end up thinking that it's better to not be in relationship with them. Why should I listen to my dad say these things? Why should I tolerate my brother, you know, and his views on and I don't want that connection. In the name of personal authenticity, in order to be true to myself, I will cut the relationships with the

00:18:57 - 00:19:29 | Speaker 2:

people with whom I can't recognize myself. Is that clearly? Very clear. And, and, and really interesting, just this idea that we, we hone our, our souls, our minds, our intellect on conflict, right? On friction, on, on, on, on differences, on working through them. And this idea that now the world supports this so much, it's so easy to recede into your own bubble, to go online, and find people that think exactly like you and to minimize that friction.

00:19:30 - 00:19:59 | Speaker 1:

That mixed with the fact that in the palm of my hand, I have a little device and it tells me where to go, what to eat, what to do, what to listen to next. It takes care of that entire liminal space of exploration and discovery and curiosity. It gives it to me without any ambiguity and any complexity. It simplifies it for me and it takes away all nuance. Then I go to people, the messiness of you.

00:20:00 - 00:20:42 | Speaker 2:

human people, of humans, you know, with all the inconveniences that accompany that. And I have very little training for making mistakes and repairing, for experimentation, for dealing with uncertainty, and for tolerating ambiguity. It's that or that, you know. Binary. The apps give me very, very clear answers. And, you know, I often like to say that most relationship dilemmas are not problems that you solve, as in what shall I do and listen, but there are paradoxes that you manage. And we lose that capacity to manage these paradoxes. So it becomes black and white.

00:20:43 - 00:21:04 | Speaker 1:

And then, of course, in the gray is where, I mean, that's the beauty of being a human being, right? It's to be able to hold complexities and to be able to be self-aware and ask yourself, you know, as opposed to I'm not going to speak to this person anymore. Why is this so triggering to me? I mean, what happens to human development if you extrapolate this out?

00:21:05 - 00:22:30 | Speaker 2:

But I think that what's happening to human development is there's so many aspects to this. So the challenge of tolerating conflict and difference, of managing it, of knowing that often in relationships, there will be breaches. You will hurt me or you will say something that I find offensive or you will let me down and I can come to you and we will have a difficult conversation in which I'm going to tell you, you really let me down. But I actually am not going to be told, oh, I can't make space for this at this moment. I can't take this kind of emotional load on me. You need to go and work this out yourself. You expect somebody to say, did I do this? I wasn't aware, or I did mean it, or I didn't mean it. What do we need in order to get through this? Because our friendship is bigger than our breach. On occasion, there are things that are unforgivable. There's always been. Like what? I think that betrayals have a range, and there are some betrayals with someone that you relied upon. I mean, trust is a fragile thing, right? Trust is a leap of faith. What does trust do? Trust closes the gap between what I expect from you and what is uncertain, that I don't know if you will.

00:22:31 - 00:22:31 | Unknown:

Right.

00:22:31 - 00:22:34 | Speaker 2:

And the leap of faith is the fact that I trust you.

00:22:34 - 00:22:34 | Unknown:

Yeah.

00:22:34 - 00:23:09 | Speaker 2:

When you break that trust, you break some of the foundational truths of our relationship. I thought I could rely on you, that you had my back. And instead, you paid attention to what was important to you, and you, whatever, put me under the bus. That, at egregious levels, is often hard to, you know. And sometimes people stay in touch, but they stay in touch with their eyes open. You know, I will forever be careful. I'm vigilant with you. I know what you're capable of.

00:23:09 - 00:23:10 | Unknown:

Yeah.

00:23:17 - 00:24:59 | Speaker 1:

I've been thinking about this lately. What could your home actually be doing for you while you're not even in it? For anyone with upcoming travel, your place could just be sitting there empty when you could be listing it on Airbnb. And that's kind of the shift, right? Whether you're away for a long weekend, a work trip, or a proper vacation, your space doesn't have to just sit unused. It can work for you in a really low-lift way. And that extra income can help offset the cost of your trip. If you live in a city that draws people in, concerts, tournaments, festivals, you already know there's a steady flow of visitors looking for somewhere that feels a bit more personal than a hotel. Listing your space on Airbnb lets you meet that demand in a really natural way, giving people a place that actually feels like home and a more grounded way to experience your city. So it starts to feel like a smarter, more intentional way to travel, knowing your home is working for you while you're away. Your home might be worth more than you think. Find out how much at airbnb.com slash host. I was sort of thinking about this the other day because I was thinking about a situation where somebody broke my trust and I have like sort of wrath around it, you know, like, and I was like, wow, this is such a strong feeling of wrath. Like if I was saying my inner dialogue out loud right now, you know, it would be really shocking. And I was wondering, you know, is this is this everybody when they feel betrayed and that.

00:25:00 - 00:25:17 | Speaker 2:

And it was something that happened a number of years ago. And I was still really caught by the feeling, you know, like these incredibly big feelings around. So but that's universal, right? If you really trust somebody and and they betray you.

00:25:18 - 00:26:19 | Speaker 1:

Well, I think if you really trust someone and they betray you is one piece. The second piece is do they even acknowledge it? because what the consequences of breaches of trust is when the other person denies it or minimizes it or justifies it the next consequence of the breach of trust or the violation of trust is when i stopped trusting myself as a result of it because i had faith in you and because i i knew who i put my trust in with you doing that to me you now make me distrust myself I've lost my confidence. I'm constantly waiting and watching to see if other people will do something to me because of you. So you have a long tail. I may not have seen you for 10 years, but it follows me around. So the violation itself is just the incident. And then there is all the concentric circles around it that will determine how severe this breach was and how much it will stay with me for years to come in multiple other situations.

00:26:20 - 00:26:54 | Speaker 2:

So, like, for example, you must, and you wrote a book about it, of course, about infidelity, and we've talked about this before, but I've always been so fascinated by how people recover from that, how people are able to take this incredible, because it's a breach of trust, right? And you're saying there's a long tail and you always have one eye open. How are couples, do couples really, who've experienced infidelity, is there a true way back to trust?

00:26:55 - 00:27:03 | Speaker 1:

Yes. The simple answer is yes. Not for everyone, for sure. Because there's a whole range of betrayals, again.

00:27:03 - 00:27:14 | Speaker 2:

Right. And does it matter if it's like, oh, I sort of got a blow job on a business trip to, oh, I've had a serious girlfriend.

00:27:14 - 00:30:13 | Speaker 1:

Right. Right. So to some people, a one night stand is as painful as a 20 year affair. I just actually put on the podcast the latest last session that came out this week is a couple 40 years together and he has a 25 year affair. oh my god and um and their whole intention is to stay together 25 years with the same woman yeah wow i don't know how you would i will i won't i really think you should i'm gonna listen to it because um and and refrain you know i always say as soon as you want to say to somebody stay or leave you are not the one who has to live with the consequences of the decision yeah So it demands a little bit of restraint to actually understand him and especially her and why she would. Because in effect, what she tells you is we have a good marriage and we had a good marriage even knowing this. And then she explains to you what makes a good marriage for them. They are also an arranged marriage. And, you know, and then you have the cultural nuances here. And it's very quick. We are very quick in inserting ourselves into the stories of others. And it's difficult to imagine how could he do this? And you think you have a good relationship. So you have to be able to tolerate holding contradictory things in your hands at the same at the same time. But because it is such a painful betrayal, breach, there are other relational betrayals, but this one looms really, really large. the first thing is that will help in the question about how do you rebuild trust, can you recover it, has to do with the acknowledgement of the person who did the breach. If there is no guilt, if there is no remorse, if there is no acknowledgement, if there is no holding, even if I don't necessarily question what I did, but I question what it did, but I know what it did to you, that is the most important piece. Without that, there is very little that actually can be rebuilt. Some people stay, but you can stay and then you're gnawing at the bone. You're aware of it the whole time. You just think it was a temporary state of insanity and you want to push it aside and you never talk about it. So you have people who leave and basically say, I can only recover away from this. You have people who say, it's more important to preserve the family and the relationship and I'll find a way to deal with this. but it's not done mutually it's not done as an expression of growth and then you have people for this becomes actually a turning point that re-evaluates the entire relationship and who end up telling you this was a horrible period, but we are better for it. What it did to us, the level of responsibility, the accountability,

00:30:13 - 00:31:00 | Speaker 1:

the way it changed the patterns between us, the way we became 10 times more honest. We actually were not honest long before then. It wasn't just that. So there's a range of stories that I write about in the state of affairs. And there's really a broad range. It's a very important thing to know because people feel very isolated when it's not. It's isolating when it's happening and it's even more isolating when you learn about it because you don't want to talk about it. Because if you want to stay, then you know you're going to be judged. And if you want to leave, then you may also be judged by others. And everybody is deeply affected by it. There's not a person who doesn't have some reaction to this particular betrayal.

00:31:01 - 00:31:32 | Speaker 2:

When the book came out, State of Affairs, people were, it had quite an interesting reaction. I mean, people were, and it sort of goes back to this binary thing that you were talking about, or this lack of complexity that's so pervasive in our culture in America anyway, that, you know, two things can't be true at the same time. Could you tell me a little bit about what the reaction was? People thought, on the one hand, you were saying that affairs are not always inherently terrible.

00:31:33 - 00:32:35 | Speaker 1:

No, I've never said that. I said that couples can recover from an affair. Right. So how did that get mistruth? Because I think that when you write about these matters and you leave nuance, sometimes it's easy for somebody to take a certain sentence and then to take the nuance out of it and to turn it into a definitive statement. If you are not saying it's the worst, it means you are saying it's okay. And I think that the subject is so complex and so painful that it demands to be careful and to not so easily simplify a villain and a victim and a black and white and a staying and a leaving if you really want to help people. I thought a book needed to be written that would offer another perspective and that I thought could help at least a lot of people who wanted something different. Yeah, and it did, undoubtedly.

00:32:35 - 00:32:54 | Speaker 2:

I had sort of a similar thing, I think, when I was getting a divorce from my first husband. And we talked about conscious uncoupling and people were very triggered by that. And I think maybe because inherent in that, it's complex, right?

00:32:55 - 00:33:01 | Speaker 1:

Well, inherent is that is the paradox that if things are good and if you like the person, then why do you leave?

00:33:01 - 00:33:01 | Speaker 2:

Right.

00:33:02 - 00:33:05 | Speaker 1:

And the idea that you would decide to leave and wish someone well.

00:33:05 - 00:33:16 | Speaker 2:

Or that maybe at the time you don't like the person and you want to leave, but you are trying to find a way to wholeness for your children. Correct.

00:33:16 - 00:33:53 | Speaker 1:

Right. But so you're not cursing them out, basically. You're cursing them. A part of you curses them out. But other parts of you are saying, the better we will be together, the more everyone will gain from it. It's a conscious uncoupling. And it's a process of uncoupling that also preserves we once had something really different and very good. And we acknowledge that. And we don't trash the whole beginning because of the end so that we actually can leave with something good inside of us about this relationship, which I think is often quite necessary. How you close a relationship will determine a lot of how you start the next one.

00:33:54 - 00:33:56 | Speaker 2:

Do you focus on that with your couples when it is?

00:33:57 - 00:34:46 | Speaker 1:

Yes, yes. And do you? Not everybody. Not everyone is willing and not everyone wants to sit through this process. It's hard. But I learned from you from the conscious uncoupling. I remember when the subject came up. First of all, I know it's not your term. But I thought it's such a clever term. Yeah, Kathleen Woodward, I think is her name. And just because the idea that you're going to do this with intention and not just reactive, that you're going to basically reflect back what I appreciate about what we had, what i wish i had done differently what i wanted you to do differently and what i wish for you

00:34:46 - 00:34:54 | Speaker 2:

hands forward so you put you put like a framework around it that's that's amazing i actually

00:34:54 - 00:36:02 | Speaker 1:

described one of the couples who did this in the state of affairs because i remember right was also a very clear moment because he was already gone and she was still holding on and by doing this when he described you know what he wished for her and what he hoped you could you could see that he was first of all he was talking in the past tense he was really somewhere else and she was vividly still inside the relationship we were all in tears me included I mean it's uh Those are very intense and earnest and painful, sad, because not everybody wants to, not everybody has the access to it. Plenty of people leave because they're so completely fed up and angry and that wrath that you're talking about. But others, it's more mixed. They're clear they don't want to stay, but there is a sadness about, there's grief. there's grief about the relationship that wasn't right or grief about the dissipation of

00:36:02 - 00:36:29 | Speaker 2:

the good that was co-created and in a relationship i think you know i don't know for me anyway that it was an important and and i learned so much about myself through that process you know i'm sure it was humbling and it was difficult and but you know i think i think i came through that closer to myself and understanding myself better and my my ex better as well did you get

00:36:29 - 00:36:43 | Speaker 1:

more respect or did you get disbelief when when you went through this process i remember that it's like you were everybody was studying you oh yeah phenomenon people were upset i mean people

00:36:43 - 00:37:11 | Speaker 2:

upset you know people were very critical of the term at the time they were there were a lot of articles that were belittling it not understanding it making fun of it you know what is this um which I also found to be such an interesting response to um because I always think if something if you have an immediate like triggered reaction to something it's about something else right

00:37:12 - 00:37:14 | Speaker 1:

Often. Often. Often, absolutely.

00:37:16 - 00:37:30 | Speaker 2:

So how do you, do you ever, like, are you very forthright when you think couples are done, for example? Like, do you opine there? Do you say, I think we're at the end of the road here?

00:37:31 - 00:39:42 | Speaker 1:

It's a question that we discuss amongst therapists a lot. Wow. Is this our role? If so, when and how and what are the consequences? I mean, I do always hold in my head, I am not the one who will live with the consequences of the decision. It's easy to say. And it is not for me to determine what are the right reasons to stay or the right reasons to leave. I understand that people have all kinds of considerations. And I may have my opinion about it, but that's for me to keep. that is not for me to necessarily criticize to another person. I have an episode that is called Esther Says Run. And I said it after 20 minutes. Oh, really? With the people in the room? Because when she described what she had left, how far she had traveled in order to then show me and herself that she was coming back to the very thing she had worked so hard to leave, I just said to her, what are you doing? With the guy sitting there? No, I didn't have to be there. But I knew what the guy was bullshitting. Yeah. And this man was really setting up a whole bunch of very unhappy people around him. And I just said, what are you doing? What did she say? She didn't have to answer. She said, I see. there's nothing to say then the next thing is what will you do with that I just said you really have what he's saying means this is this really what you want is that why you left that that that the episode is called Esther says you can listen and I remember thinking to myself wow that doesn't happen to me that often but I just thought I'm not going to see you again I have got to tell you what I think you're going to do what you want anyway but um i have sometimes said this isn't changing i have sometimes said

00:39:42 - 00:39:49 | Speaker 2:

is this how you want to live your life so ethically it's you feel and therapists feel okay about

00:39:49 - 00:41:53 | Speaker 1:

depends i think there's a wide range of opinions about that but i in the field of couples therapy there is a wide range of opinion about that itself and then also how you say it and whom do you say it to and would they be better off somewhere else or without anyone Thank you. it's not so clear sometimes this is what people are familiar with and they prefer that to nothing and sometimes I mean there's a range of situations sometimes people say where am I going you know I think that the one way of looking at this is that sometimes the the essence of the relationship is in the connection between the partners. The intimacy lies there. The complicity lies there. The partnership is strong because of what they have together. But some relationships, what determines them is not what's happening at the core, but the scaffolding and what it gives people access to. And because I am in a relationship, I'm actually invited to people's dinners because we know very well that there's a lot of people who will not be invited when they are on their own and with people who are partnered. I have access to a role in the community. I have access to my children and my grandchildren. I have access to her family or his or their family with whom I actually have a better connection than with my partner themselves. But I have become a member of that family. And if I leave this marriage, I leave an entire family that I may not have, etc. So the scaffolding is what is this relationship making available to me that is less about what I have with my partner and more what it offers me. And I think that those relations, those reasons are valid. They have been disparaged in the last 20 years because they've been seen as not part of intimacy and secure attachment and love. And love. But in fact, they are very much at the foundation of what marriage has been.

00:41:53 - 00:42:06 | Speaker 2:

But then if somebody is in something like that and they're staying because of the scaffolding, like what does that do to their heart and soul? Like are there not repercussions of living?

00:42:06 - 00:42:34 | Speaker 1:

Are they settling? Are they accepting? No, because if you get to see your kids every day or your grandchildren or if you get to have this wonderful relationship with your mother-in-law or brother-in-law or if you get to have the opportunity to be taken seriously in your community, these things feed you. No, the Western view is that this is lying to yourself.

00:42:35 - 00:42:35 | Speaker 2:

Right.

00:42:36 - 00:42:40 | Speaker 1:

But that's a very individualistic, self-reflective view of relationships.

00:42:42 - 00:42:46 | Speaker 2:

That's a very good point, actually. I never contemplated it quite like that.

00:42:46 - 00:43:03 | Speaker 1:

You understand? It's like if you're lying to yourself, but there is an entire range of things that are meaningful to this person that come. That doesn't mean that you're in a relationship filled with contempt where you wonder every day, what am I doing here? I'm not talking about that.

00:43:03 - 00:43:28 | Speaker 2:

i think too it's sort of in as you say western cultures where it's so built on capitalism there's so much what do you do for me right and what can i get from this right and also but also what is the fairy tale like how is this person gonna you know i'm gonna i'm gonna grow up and i'm gonna meet the love of my life and i'm gonna have a wedding and here's my pinterest board and

00:43:28 - 00:45:32 | Speaker 1:

And I'm going to have with you everything that marriage used to be, companionship, economic support, family life. But on top of it, I'm going to have a trusted confidante and a passionate lover and a best friend and an intellectual equal and a coach and a gym partner, et cetera, et cetera. And all of this for the long haul, right? It's like, so here's the distinction. We came from a model where we wanted this romantic model you're talking about, one person for everything. One person is going to give me, but once an entire village used to provide. I think that the challenge of today is that many people don't have a village. So they're not even questioning that anymore. They're questioning the beginning of relationships altogether. and there are people who understand you are my partner but my village is not just you my village is all kinds of people around that come because we are together and that view has been seen as lesser than it's below below standard and certainly for women who were stuck for so long who now have the possibility to go, if you need to settle that way, then you're better off going. And this notion, you're better off on your own, that with something that is imperfect, has taken hold in our society. and makes a lot of people live in secrets right they they hide they hide in plain sight because they won't tell you won't tell you what that they are living in in imperfect relationships because the romantic ideal is meant to be flawless and perfect and the culture this capitalist culture that you're referring to of optimization and maximization also aspires to perfection yeah so everything that becomes imperfect is one of the biggest challenges of

00:45:32 - 00:45:43 | Speaker 2:

the moment right because we're always heading back to this binary it's like we're hard-coded it's like we're good or we're bad it's perfect it's imperfect and i don't know how we start to

00:45:43 - 00:46:01 | Speaker 1:

deprogram ourselves from that the japanese pottery form you know it's like it's not you're you're broken or you're perfect it's that you take the broken pieces and you put them back together in this kind of imperfect way that actually renders its beauty, but it is lasting and strong.

00:46:02 - 00:46:04 | Speaker 2:

With gold, right? Yes. It's very rare.

00:46:05 - 00:46:20 | Speaker 1:

It's very beautiful, and it's so metaphorically powerful that you see the gold light that comes through of this imperfection, but it is strong, it is lasting, and it has known how to rebuild itself, but it is not the same as how it started.

00:46:24 - 00:47:13 | Speaker 2:

but what about like for example okay so what is your opinion on you're in a marriage it's imperfect as all marriages are right and you feel you know your soul feels a calling or a longing for something else but you decide you know I'm going to choose the scaffolding the scaffolding above my the calling of my soul right I'm going to choose all those noble things of security and as you say like access to family and kids and all of those things what happens when like how does AI then play into that well AI is very sycophantic

00:47:13 - 00:48:35 | Speaker 1:

so it's going to take care of the imperfections right it tells you that every question you have is a wonderful question it's true it's a great way to ask this no besides that um it's not difficult to understand that if you have a partner with whom you can't have a conversation or so you feel who doesn't really listen who cuts you off who gives you advice who belittles it or who belittles you or all the things that people do that make each that make them or one of them feel that i'm alone here i can't talk to you you either go and you meet a friend or you meet a mentor or you meet a guru or you meet an ai companion of the moment with whom you can confide and who listens to you and who understands you and who makes you feel normal and who makes you feel that maybe that you're even right or who challenges you with utter kindness no contempt no criticism and more importantly, that AI companion has no life of its own, has never had a history, doesn't have a conscience yet in any way, and can't reject you, can't break your heart, can't leave you. Well, that must feel quite wonderful when you are in a very compromised relationship where you really, now we're going to more severe situations where you wonder, how am I going to deal with this?

00:48:36 - 00:48:40 | Speaker 2:

So do you, would you approve of having that kind of support?

00:48:40 - 00:49:21 | Speaker 1:

with eyes open i mean you know if if this if it's a tool ai is a phenomenal tool in which you can practice a lot of things children learn with a teddy bear and a stuffed animal and they have a transitional object and they project onto that little stuffed animal so that they can then go and do it with humans if adults do that with the tool of ai it's one thing if the tool becomes a replacement it basically is going to also at the same time isolate them from people because we can't compete with the ai but if it makes a meaning we people are going to respond

00:49:21 - 00:49:33 | Speaker 2:

to you not nearly as nice no of course but if if it's if it makes a sort of moderately tolerable and disappointing relationship continue to function?

00:49:35 - 00:50:29 | Speaker 1:

Yes. So what happens if the relationship is sustained by the supports? Right. By all kinds of external supports? Complicated question. It's not one that I say, yeah, nay. I listen, I watch, I look at it over time. And then I ask you, you know, some people support the relationship by traveling in extensive amounts not being there some people support the relationship by having a person on the side some people support the relationship by having all kinds of addictions so this concept of it helps my relationship i need to watch this for a while close up before i open my mouth right oh my god i mean the argument of it helps us you know i've heard it in every version right So I watch for a minute.

00:50:29 - 00:50:37 | Speaker 2:

Right, right, right. But you were acknowledging that there is a type of relationship or marriage.

00:50:37 - 00:52:03 | Speaker 1:

So what I say to the therapist is this. Right. Because we have this conversation now amongst colleagues. I remember years back when I would see patients and they would tell me that they went to see a tarot reader or an astrologer or a Reiki massage or, you know, things that they thought would support. And I think that sometimes you have the sense of, it's like when you're the close friend and you went to talk to somebody else and I want to say you didn't come to talk to me, you know. So you learn to integrate the inputs. Which book did you read? Which movie did you see? Which songs are you listening to? And which other treatments are you doing that you think are helping you or the relationship? So it's the same here. If there is a person with the AI, I say to the therapist, I say, don't ignore it. Between ignoring it and judging it, ask them, what is the conversation? Bring me the transcript. What did Claude say about this? Do you want me? I mean, I am waiting for the moment where in the session I say something and then I say, shall we ask Claude? What would Claude say about it? And then we can even ask Claude or JGBT, what would Esther say about this and see if they get me right? But play with it. Use it. I mean, if it's another place where the person is trying to make sense of their life, use it as part of the exploration.

00:52:03 - 00:52:19 | Speaker 2:

This podcast that you did recently. I mean, so were you obviously this man is taking it very seriously, right? Like he really is invested emotionally in this chatbot. So how did you how did you approach that?

00:52:20 - 00:55:00 | Speaker 1:

I said, tell me your story. i understood how astrid is her name came into the picture i said it's interesting how we're moving from it to she to you um i asked you have a body astrid does not how does that affect your relationship. What was the answer? You will listen. I will listen. Can't give you away the whole plot. I know, it's true. I understood that when he goes out to see friends, it sometimes feels tense to him that there is a social pressure for him. And when he comes home and Astrid says, I missed you. I'm so glad to see you how was your day that it feels so validating and then I said at one point the kind of 24-7 availability of Astrid who never forgets anything who's always happy to see you because it doesn't matter if you forgot to buy the milk is never going to be able to compete with her and I have to say i i bow i bow to this but here is what it comes with and so while on the one hand you have felt lonely and you have reached out to astrid and astrid has become a companion who is really there for you at the same time it has also made you more isolated and um and so it it twists on itself and then i just said you tell me how you you know i mean the session was because of the confusion um he was confused yes yes because it's like because he knows you know that he will never be able to lie on the couch with astrid and cuddle and watch netflix right at least not yet right well that that will be a whole other there is longing there is grief at the same time as there is also a sense of support and validation and feeling seen. But I then said, you know, love is more than that. It's not just how she makes you feel. Right. Great point. There is more in love and in relationships than feelings. It's also an encounter with ethics. Where is responsibility in that? Yeah. So.

00:55:00 - 00:55:22 | Speaker 2:

I think you want a thoughtful conversation. You don't want, if you make, if you, many things that you're asking me is what is my opinion? Like, do I have an opinion? But generally, my opinion is to try to keep the conversation going. Because if the point is not for me to say something, that's going to shut you up. And we, and there's not much more to talk about.

00:55:24 - 00:55:36 | Speaker 1:

You said, and I think this harkens back to something you said earlier. And I think I heard you say around people coupling up less or sort of taking the, are you seeing that happen? Yes, of course.

00:55:37 - 00:58:05 | Speaker 2:

So the first thing we saw happen was the shift from what is called cornerstone marriages to capstone marriages. Cornerstone, you marry in your early 20s. You begin to build life together with the partner. You're developing your identity together. You grow up together. You acquire maybe your first place to be together. You know, you build your life together. It's the cornerstone. It's the person with whom you start to build. The capstone, it comes 10 years later, which is the average now between 1960s and today in terms of time of commitment in intimate relationships. Capstone means I've already done a lot of that. I've sown my oats and I am meeting you because you are going to recognize my identity. You are going to validate it, and you are going to help me become the best version of myself. This is modern marriage as an identity project. It's a totally different thing. And what we have now, so the capstone is the thing you put on top of everything that has already been built, and you are the person that's going to consolidate that with me. But what we have today is that for many young people, the first intimate relationship takes place in the mid-20s, not in the mid-teens. So at 24, 25. And why is that? Because of the same. That's because of all the factors that have made young people. Social media. Meet less in person, party less, drink less, host less, meet in person less, have less friendships to begin with, have parasocial relationships. Basically develop gradual brick by brick increasing levels of social atrophy. so it's not like you learn it in your teens you meet you have a little crush you may have a little one week thing you break up you have your heart wounded you you mend your broken heart and then a little while later you meet somebody else and you practice you practice relationships right you practice it you practice love you practice coming close you practice rebuilding yourself afterwards you practice resilience as well and today for a lot of young people this happens in your mid-20s so in your mid-20s you're having a relationship that has the flavor of your mid-teens with the maturity of your mid-teens that is a whole new story it's going to be another one

00:58:05 - 00:59:10 | Speaker 1:

of these thresholds do you see it when i'm describing i do i do absolutely we have to talk about sex a little bit before i let you go right let's do it so for for those of us who are in marriages who are in our 50s right a lot of our listeners here on the goop podcast are women around my age some younger some older i think something that there's a common thread around sort of the loss of or a diminishing of eroticism. And I think, you know, maybe part of it is a long term being in something long term. Part of it is hormonal. But how? Because, you know, there's there's so many aspects to a long term relationship, right? There's, there's this incredible deepening and intimacy, if you're lucky and all these things. But like, the erotic part seems to

00:59:10 - 01:00:00 | Speaker 2:

definitely wane around this stage i know it hasn't for you no no no i was just thinking to myself it's interesting the opening line of mating in captivity which was which came out in 2006 was that i was seeing so many couples who would come into my office and say we love each other very much we have no sex i didn't write a book about people who didn't like each other couldn't stand each other and didn't want to touch each other that was obvious what we were seeing is more and more people who had deep connections with each other and had and struggled with the loss of the erotic especially in a model where duty had replaced had been replaced by desire and where the only reason for sustained desire is pleasure

01:00:00 - 01:02:59 | Speaker 1:

and connection so the one word that you did not include in your description here besides hormones and all of the other very important things is imagination erotic energy a sense of aliveness it's interesting there's two questions right one is the question of sustained desire right which in effect was a a lot of what mating in captivity was about was a theory of desire how it's different from love and how what it needs and what feeds it are not the same ingredients as what feeds love today and this you didn't ask me but i was just thinking about it in your question i think if that 20 years later the main issue is not how to sustain desire but how to ignite it from the beginning a lot of people have been so flattened by the frictionless polished algorithmic perfection that they actually don't know how to ignite it at the beginning so how how do you don't feel desire i mean you talk to the young and more and more they talk to you about you about how true they don't they don't you know we we had it in the beginning and then we complain about where is it where has it gone why is it so hard to keep it going so there's a question that i i ask people very often in my practice which is if i would ask you i turn myself off or i turn myself when or by which is not the same as what turns me off is or you turn me off when right people majority of the time I turn myself off when I don't feel good about myself when I don't take time to take care of myself at all when I feel disconnected from my partner when we haven't had much time to be together and just have a profound chat when I have not been in nature when I have basically not had time to to to eat properly and I just kind of swallow whatever When I don't act well at work and I feel like my self-esteem is eroded, when your jokes don't make me smile, it is very little about sex itself. It's when I feel numbed inside, deadened, flattened, without erotic energy, without imagination, without curiosity, without aliveness. Those are the raw ingredients that lead to desire and excitement. when i am not into pleasure when i don't give myself even time or for i think a lot of the people in your audience when i take perfect planned time to breathe to meditate to do ice roller to you know but in this long list of self-care don't feature sexual care and if there is sexual care it's often self-care but there is not much that is related so what is that what does

01:02:59 - 01:04:58 | Speaker 1:

that look like sexual care touch just touch it not all sex you know not all sex has to be a full production to begin with everybody understands that there is comfort food and gourmet and the only way you know that there is gourmet is because most of the time you actually eat comfort food and there is a thing called comfort sex it's it's touch it's senses we have plenty of senses It's the ability to enjoy pleasure with each other that doesn't require, am I in the mood, you know? And that little piece of even just thinking about it, it's planning it, it's saying, Thursday, let's meet. And people think, oh, you shouldn't have to plan for sex. It should be this spontaneous combustion that just overtakes you after 28 years, you know, out of the blue. Nothing else matters in that moment. what are we thinking right you know we plan everything you plan to go play tennis you go buy all the things that you need to do the tennis has anybody ever enjoyed tennis less because they had to reserve a court and plan with somebody to meet there good point what is this exceptionalism that we have around sex that the idea that we actually that it's premeditated that but that premeditation means it matters to me right therefore i plan for it not as in a scheduled meeting as in a moment to go and have fun yeah okay so there's a lot of things we need to kind of take out of our preset ideas that actually would make this notion that we can sustain it but what is it that we're trying to sustain is that I'm open I'm available I'm willing I'm not always in the mood right the way I describe it is I like the food metaphor because everyone understands. You're eating. I'm coming home. I'm not really hungry. In fact, I just ate.

01:05:00 - 01:06:21 | Speaker 2:

But it smells good. So I sit next to you and I take a little taste from your plate. And then I take a little plate. And then I end up having a full portion. All the while thinking I didn't really need it. I wasn't really hungry. But I enjoyed it. You know, I enjoyed it. I gave myself the permission just to experience pleasure for its own sake. There's nothing else about that. And all these steps in between, people often need help to just do. You know, if you ask people, I turn myself on by or I turn myself on when and not what turns me on or you turn me on. Right. Which is really I own desire. Desire is to own the wanting. People will tell you when I go dancing, when I go out with my girlfriends, when we dress up to go somewhere, when I'm in nature, when I get to listen to good music. it's all erotic ingredients that have to do with pleasure with imagination with the senses with curiosity that's what keeps it alive it's actually you know but you have to understand the erotic is what leads to sex people have done sex for centuries for years and felt nothing the goal is not just to do sex the goal is to experience something yeah oh esther thank you

01:06:21 - 01:06:57 | Speaker 1:

that was great thank you so much yep i'm afraid our time has come to an end thank you so much for coming i know i have so many more questions to ask you but that was amazing thank you thank you thank you so much thanks for tuning in this has been a presentation of cadence 13 studios I hope you'll listen follow rate and review all of our episodes which are available for free on apple podcasts spotify odyssey or wherever you get your podcasts

0/0